# GozmanGonzalez Delegate Communication Thread **URL:** \ **Category:** Delegate Statements\ **Tags:** delegate-statements\ **Created:** [June 3, 2025, 11:46pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/gozmangonzalez-delegate-communication-thread/29391 "2025-06-03T23:46:04Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 4
**Author:** ![GozmanGonzalez](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/gozmangonzalez/32/14717_2.png) [@GozmanGonzalez](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/GozmanGonzalez)\ **Post date:** [June 24, 2025, 6:12pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/gozmangonzalez-delegate-communication-thread/29391/4 "2025-06-24T18:12:37Z")
**Proposal: [Arbitrum Treasury Management Council – Consolidating Efforts](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/arbitrum-treasury-management-council-consolidating-efforts/29334/36)** **Vote: For** **Rationale:** I voted **For** because this proposal streamlines treasury oversight by replacing fragmented structures with a unified council. It reduces inefficiencies, improves coordination, and keeps the DAO in control, without adding extra cost. While centralization concerns exist, ongoing transparency and accountability will be key. Overall, it’s a smart, scalable upgrade for Arbitrum’s treasury management. **Proposal: [[Constitutional] AIP: Remove Cost Cap on Arbitrum Nova](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/constitutional-aip-remove-cost-cap-on-arbitrum-nova/29332/29)** **Vote: For** **Rationale:** Removing Nova’s cost cap is a logical next step. With EIP-4844 and Orbit adoption shifting demand, this proposal ends an outdated subsidy and realigns Nova’s fees with its true role in the ecosystem. Teams seeking ultra-low costs now have better options via Orbit, making continued treasury spend here inefficient. We support this shift—as long as clear communication and smooth transitions are prioritized for affected teams. --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/gozmangonzalez-delegate-communication-thread/29391)._