# Griff Green - Delegate Communication Thread **URL:** \ **Category:** Delegate Statements\ **Tags:** delegation, delegate-statements\ **Created:** [June 19, 2024, 10:29pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/griff-green-delegate-communication-thread/25040 "2024-06-19T22:29:27Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 69
**Author:** ![Griff](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/griff/32/964_2.png) [@Griff](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Griff)\ **Post date:** [August 1, 2025, 6:46pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/griff-green-delegate-communication-thread/25040/69 "2025-08-01T18:46:13Z")
# Delegate Update: July # **[Proposal: Extend AGV Council Term and Align Future Elections with Operational Cadence](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/proposal-extend-agv-council-term-and-align-future-elections-with-operational-cadence/29425)** > [@Proposal: Extend AGV Council Term and Align Future Elections with Operational Cadence](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/proposal-extend-agv-council-term-and-align-future-elections-with-operational-cadence/29425/28): > > Vote: FOR It make sense to keep the AGV going til the end of the year to sync with everything. With that said, term extensions without public evaluation sets a weak precedent, there is a lot of comms going on behind the scenes but before the next cycle we need clear and regular reporting on what the council is delivering and where it can improve Supporting this now for operational clarity but expect stronger public accountability mechanisms moving forward. # **[Arbitrum Research and Development Collective V2 - Extension](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/arbitrum-research-and-development-collective-v2-extension/29476)** > [@Arbitrum Research and Development Collective V2 - Extension](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/arbitrum-research-and-development-collective-v2-extension/29476/24): > > Voting DON’T EXTEND The ARDC had their moments, but in the end we have a good idea about the problems out there right now and don’t need to pay a million dollars to confirm them. Given the big changes in DAO organization, the research can happen within the AAE’s, they have huge budgets and then the research can happen in loop with the other work they are pushing. # **[[CONSTITUTIONAL] Register $BORING in the Arbitrum generic-custom gateway](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/constitutional-register-boring-in-the-arbitrum-generic-custom-gateway/29206)** > [@\[CONSTITUTIONAL\] Register $BORING in the Arbitrum generic-custom gateway](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/constitutional-register-boring-in-the-arbitrum-generic-custom-gateway/29206/26): > > Voting FOR I support the proposal. BORING is a well-established protocol and this is a straightforward technical update to enable bridging. Appreciate L2BEAT for handling this and for doing the behind-the-scenes work that keeps the DAO functional. # **[[Constitutional] AIP: Update the Upgrade Executors](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/constitutional-aip-update-the-upgrade-executors/29463)** > [@\[Constitutional\] AIP: Update the Upgrade Executors](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/constitutional-aip-update-the-upgrade-executors/29463/15): > > Voting FOR As far as I can tell, this upgrade makes governance easier and cheaper by letting call contracts directly without extra steps. It doesn’t change who controls things or add risk. Same security model, same ownership, just less overhead. I hope I’m getting it right. Proposals like this are purely technical housekeeping. We don’t need to waste delegate time debating them every cycle. This kind of proposal should just be optimistically approved so the DAO can move faster and focus on bigg… # **[Entropy Advisors: Exclusively Working with the Arbitrum DAO, Y2-Y3](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/entropy-advisors-exclusively-working-with-the-arbitrum-dao-y2-y3/29458)** > [@Entropy Advisors: Exclusively Working with the Arbitrum DAO, Y2-Y3](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/entropy-advisors-exclusively-working-with-the-arbitrum-dao-y2-y3/29458/36): > > Voting FOR Entropy has done important work building out the DAO’s governance infrastructure and the coordination of all these proposals and stakeholder alignment has helped keep things running smoothly. Given their performance so far, doubling down makes sense! We need a clear plan to maintain Arbitrum’s governance effectiveness over time, it is important to ensure continued success, I am hopeful Entropy can be a big part of managing that. > [@Entropy Advisors: Exclusively Working with the Arbitrum DAO, Y2-Y3](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/entropy-advisors-exclusively-working-with-the-arbitrum-dao-y2-y3/29458/54): > > Voting FOR on Tally I support continuing the engagement and giving the team room to grow, especially given how much coordination work Entropy has carried behind the scenes. With this kind of long-term commitment, I wish that it was clearer in the proposal what exactly success looks like… but I fully trust the Entropy crew to kick ass. # **[Updating the Code of Conduct & DAO’s Procedures](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/updating-the-code-of-conduct-daos-procedures/29594)** > [@Updating the Code of Conduct & DAO's Procedures](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/updating-the-code-of-conduct-daos-procedures/29594/17): > > You guys are heroes! Thank you for pushing this out! I support extending this trial period to keep testing these norms in the wild before we lock anything into the Constitution. It is a healthy iterative approach that gives us extra time to keep learning and adjust based on real usage I love the clear expectations around behavior and direction for managing difficult discussions without turning things into a drama. The one piece of feedback I would give is to make the clawback to be onchain ins… # **[Consolidate Idle USDC to the ATMC’s Stablecoin Balance](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/consolidate-idle-usdc-to-the-atmc-s-stablecoin-balance/29619)** > [@Consolidate Idle USDC to the ATMC’s Stablecoin Balance](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/consolidate-idle-usdc-to-the-atmc-s-stablecoin-balance/29619/25): > > Voted FOR It makes total sense to move all three buckets of idle funds into a place where they can earn yield. It’s a smart and responsible treasury management and I’m happy to support it. # **[[Constitutional] AIP: Disable Legacy Tether Bridge](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/constitutional-aip-disable-legacy-tether-bridge/29503)** > [@\[Constitutional\] AIP: Disable Legacy Tether Bridge](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/constitutional-aip-disable-legacy-tether-bridge/29503/25): > > Voting for. It’s not doing anything useful anymore, just going to confuse users… The UX of crypto is bad enough already without needing a bridge to a dead end. --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/griff-green-delegate-communication-thread/25040)._