# Griff Green - Delegate Communication Thread **URL:** \ **Category:** Delegate Statements\ **Tags:** delegation, delegate-statements\ **Created:** [June 19, 2024, 10:29pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/griff-green-delegate-communication-thread/25040 "2024-06-19T22:29:27Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 74
**Author:** ![Griff](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/griff/32/964_2.png) [@Griff](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Griff)\ **Post date:** [May 4, 2026, 7:19pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/griff-green-delegate-communication-thread/25040/74 "2026-05-04T19:19:39Z")
# Delegate Update: March & April # [Automate the Consolidation of Idle Funds into the Treasury Management Portfolio](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/automate-the-consolidation-of-idle-funds-into-the-treasury-management-portfolio/30579) > [@Automate the Consolidation of Idle Funds into the Treasury Management Portfolio](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/automate-the-consolidation-of-idle-funds-into-the-treasury-management-portfolio/30579/10): > > I’ll be voting FOR this on Snapshot. Getting yield out of idle stables is the way to go, and I also think its nice to consolidate DAO funds if they go unused. I get where JoJo and SEEDGov are coming from with their concerns about timing and not getting in the way of the S3 talks. But overall I agree with Entropy’s point about this the S2 surplus money that’s been sitting around for 9 months…. How much value is lost to inflation of USD? I think the real deciding factor is who owns this money? … # [[Constitutional] DVP Quorum for ArbitrumDAO: Implementation & Parameters](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/constitutional-dvp-quorum-for-arbitrumdao-implementation-parameters/30484) > [@\[Constitutional\] DVP Quorum for ArbitrumDAO: Implementation & Parameters](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/constitutional-dvp-quorum-for-arbitrumdao-implementation-parameters/30484/52): > > Voting FOR (on Tally). Basing quorum on active delegates is a great way forward. Also, a huge fan of getting the on-chain cancel button. Forcing the DAO to vote down a flawed proposal that even the creator wants to pull was always a massive waste of everyone’s time. # [March 2026 Security Council Election: Nominee Selection](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/march-2026-security-council-election-nominee-selection/30682) > [@March 2026 Security Council Election: Nominee Selection](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/march-2026-security-council-election-nominee-selection/30682/4): > > My voting rationale for Security Council Election #6. I made two rounds of votes. First votes (early signal) My first votes were meant as an early signal of support to communicate clearly to the community who I believe are strong candidates and should be considered. Here’s how I thought about it: Pablo Sabbatella – Pablo’s operational security background is exactly what the Security Council needs. He’s the community leader in opsec and brings very practical, real-world experience. This is … # [Updating the Code of Conduct & DAO Procedures to Become Living Documents](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/updating-the-code-of-conduct-dao-procedures-to-become-living-documents/30664) > [@Updating the Code of Conduct & DAO Procedures to Become Living Documents](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/updating-the-code-of-conduct-dao-procedures-to-become-living-documents/30664/7): > > Voting For I’m supportive of making the CoC a living document. Honestly tho, I’m not a fan of making shielded voting optional. As I’ve said before, shielded voting should be used whenever possible. The bias of real-time results is real!. I’ll support this, but I really hope proposers default to shielded voting more, as opposed to less after this! # [[Constitutional] AIP: ArbOS 60 Elara](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/constitutional-aip-arbos-60-elara/30601) > [@\[Constitutional\] AIP: ArbOS 60 Elara](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/constitutional-aip-arbos-60-elara/30601/5): > > Voting FOR Upgrading to ArbOS 60 is a no brainer. All the new features are just awesome. Honestly tho, having the whole DAO vote on these heavy tech upgrades is too much overhead. It would be way better to fund a selected group of technical experts to review OCL’s work and then optimistically approve it. Instead of paying delegates to vote on this, let’s use that same budget to pay the tech experts! Any way.. just a thought since Tally is not running the show anymore, it opens us up to more opt… # [Transfer 6,000 ETH and Idle Stablecoins from the Treasury to the Treasury Management Portfolio](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/transfer-6-000-eth-and-idle-stablecoins-from-the-treasury-to-the-treasury-management-portfolio/30691) > [@Transfer 6,000 ETH and Idle Stablecoins from the Treasury to the Treasury Management Portfolio](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/transfer-6-000-eth-and-idle-stablecoins-from-the-treasury-to-the-treasury-management-portfolio/30691/9): > > Vote: FOR This is an easy yes. Having 6K ETH sitting idle is silly… I’m a firm believer that our capital should always be working for us. Let the ATMC put this capital to work. # [Improvements to the Arbitrum Audit Program](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/improvements-to-the-arbitrum-audit-program/30697) > [@Improvements to the Arbitrum Audit Program](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/improvements-to-the-arbitrum-audit-program/30697/5): > > Vote: FOR Exclusivity is great on paper, but it’s pretty unreasonable for most projects to sign on to. It makes perfect sense for us to be reasonable here and allow for leniency here, as long as there is a clear design that shows Arbitrum is the most important chain… No point in giving special treatment to projects that aren’t giving us special treatment back! For the AI pilot… I love that. My only request to the committee is that we actually track the ROI; credits scale up quickly. Let’s meas… # [[Constitutional] AIP: Approve Release of Frozen ETH](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/constitutional-aip-approve-release-of-frozen-eth/30825) > [@\[Constitutional\] AIP: Approve Release of Frozen ETH](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/constitutional-aip-approve-release-of-frozen-eth/30825/3): > > As a member of the Security Council and as a delegate, I want to be clear that I am speaking here only in my role as a delegate. My role as a Security Council member in this matter is complete. I agree with @Nicksta & strongly support expediting this process. We should move to a Snapshot vote as soon as possible to validate the community’s intent and avoid unnecessary delays in unlocking these funds. That said, before progressing to the on-chain vote, there are still critical open questions th… > [@\[Constitutional\] AIP: Approve Release of Frozen ETH](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/constitutional-aip-approve-release-of-frozen-eth/30825/14): > > Not super happy with the 49 day timeline… I would like to see it sped up some how, but for a temp check, I am overall very supportive. Again I am speaking as a delegate, not as a Security Council member. # [March 2026 Security Council Election: Member Election](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/march-2026-security-council-election-member-election/30773) > [@March 2026 Security Council Election: Member Election](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/march-2026-security-council-election-member-election/30773/2): > > VOTING RATIONALE Putting it here cause it seems like the right spot…? I made my first comment for nominees here: Again I made two rounds of votes. First votes (early signal) My first votes were meant as an early signal of support to communicate clearly to the community who I believe are strong candidates and should be considered. I voted for: Pablo Sabbatella kemmio Gustavo Grieco Michael Lewellen Yoav blockful (Alex Netto) Certora Cyfrin I would have voted for others too but they were … --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/griff-green-delegate-communication-thread/25040)._