# Hackathon Continuation Program

**URL:** <https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/hackathon-continuation-program/27492>\
**Category:** Finalized AIPs\
**Created:** [November 10, 2024, 9:35am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/hackathon-continuation-program/27492 "2024-11-10T09:35:53Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 77

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ocandocrypto](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/ocandocrypto/32/5015_2.png) [@ocandocrypto](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/ocandocrypto)\
**Post date:** [November 29, 2024, 2:01am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/hackathon-continuation-program/27492/77 "2024-11-29T02:01:38Z")

</div>

As in @web3citizenxyz representation, voting **in favour, on chain mechanis** m in this proposal and below is our rationale.

> [@Web3 Citizen Delegate Communication Thread](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/web3-citizen-delegate-communication-thread/27518/5):
>
> Snapshot vote: Hackathon Continuation Program We will vote in favour, onchain mechanism We believe this proposal holds the necessary components to ensure hackathon projects can continue to work on their concepts and, given validation and fit, continue development with the support of the ecosystem. Assessment criteria and budget seem reasonable. And we’re generally in support of the thinking and planning behind the proposal: Re: extending selection We would not lower the threshold for this …

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/hackathon-continuation-program/27492)._
