# Hackathon Continuation Program

**URL:** <https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/hackathon-continuation-program/27492>\
**Category:** Finalized AIPs\
**Created:** [November 10, 2024, 9:35am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/hackathon-continuation-program/27492 "2024-11-10T09:35:53Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 96

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![0xTALVO.ETH\_MTY](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/0xtalvo.eth_mty/32/10365_2.png) [@0xTALVO.ETH\_MTY](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/0xTALVO.ETH_MTY)\
**Post date:** [December 6, 2024, 5:42am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/hackathon-continuation-program/27492/96 "2024-12-06T05:42:54Z")

</div>

I’d like to reaffirm my vote on Tally **in favor** because of what I mention before:

> [@0xTALVO.ETH\_MTY](#):
>
> I think it offers a good structure that will help ensure hackathon projects turn into real solutions that benefit Arbitrum ecosystem. Dividing the program into developing and validating, increases the chances of success because you only allocate more resources to the projects that will address the actual needs. This design encourages the use of funds wisely over a lengthy period of time. Also, RnDAO and Arbitrum working together helps to combine efforts and gives everyone guidance, stuff, and connections apart from the money.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/hackathon-continuation-program/27492)._