It’s clear from your reply that you’re not interested in facts or the information presented, but rather in spreading misinformation and FUD. Despite our efforts to provide you with information, facts, references, and figures to address your initial comments, you choose to ignore them and instead go off on new tangents and speculations. While we welcome feedback and criticisms, we won’t accept and will defend against baseless accusations that undermine the integrity of our project.
This is categorically FALSE. We NEVER advertise or promise an airdrop to users on another chain for trading activities they conduct on Arbitrum.We also don’t have a plan for this in the future either. Again, I cordially invite you to please share with us specific evidence for your claim here.
We have clearly explained with evidence in both our LTIPP proposal and our response to your comments that the trading volume increased due to our trading fee reduction program. Initially, such baseless accusations could be attributed to a lack of awareness and research. However, the persistence of this narrative despite our explanations indicates a malicious intent on your side.
Regarding the comment on “vampire attack on GMX”, we’ve addressed this in our STIP. This term is a gross mischaracterization as our integration with the GLP/GM pool has been to rehypothecate them - similar to how many platforms reuse yield-bearing tokens as collateral, etc. We’ve never removed liquidity from GMX—not a single penny. The only time we removed liquidity was to migrate from the GLP to the GM pool. The fact that you use the term rehypothecation and vampire attack in the same sentence here perhaps show that you don’t have a full understanding on the differences of these basic DeFi terms?
@Matt_StableLab @cliffton.eth We’ve encountered challenges with an account that doesn’t engage in good faith conversations, specifically making unfounded accusations and inaccurate statements without evidence. This not only undermines the integrity of projects that invest significant effort in their proposals but also goes against community guideline by spreading speculation and misinformation. We would greatly appreciate it if you can help address this and ensure a more constructive and fair discourse within the community. 