# Ignas Delegate Communication Thread **URL:** \ **Category:** Delegate Statements\ **Created:** [October 18, 2024, 9:31am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/ignas-delegate-communication-thread/27208 "2024-10-18T09:31:44Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 20\ **Page:** 2
**Author:** ![Ignas](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/ignas/32/11301_2.png) [@Ignas](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Ignas)\ **Post date:** [February 10, 2025, 7:39am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/ignas-delegate-communication-thread/27208/21 "2025-02-10T07:39:59Z")
**54. Proposal:** [Request to Increase the Stylus Sprint Committee’s Budget](https://snapshot.box/#/s:arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x45513bb63946582432afa7213bcb2677e877dabbd5722210efd5eaf45797031c) (Snapshot) - **Date Voted:** February 7, 2025 - **Vote** : For - **Rationale:** No more to add in my rationale. Voted yes on Snapshot. Stylus is key to keeping Arbitrum competitive, increasing the budget to fund more innovative projects makes sense 🙂 ---
**Author:** ![Ignas](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/ignas/32/11301_2.png) [@Ignas](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Ignas)\ **Post date:** [February 11, 2025, 10:40am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/ignas-delegate-communication-thread/27208/22 "2025-02-11T10:40:12Z")
**55. Proposal:** [Arbitrum D.A.O. (Domain Allocator Offerings) Grant Program - Season 3](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/arbitrum/proposal/47215139570733026393508270943324710379923699871435188004224569883226292800465?govId=eip155:42161:0x789fC99093B09aD01C34DC7251D0C89ce743e5a4) (Tally) - **Date Voted:** February 10, 2025 - **Vote:** For - **Rationale:** After considering the forum discussion and Snapshot vote, I continue to support this proposal. Arbitrum can attract more creative projects, driving innovation, and growing the ecosystem in the long term. ---
**Author:** ![Ignas](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/ignas/32/11301_2.png) [@Ignas](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Ignas)\ **Post date:** [February 18, 2025, 12:29pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/ignas-delegate-communication-thread/27208/23 "2025-02-18T12:29:00Z")
**56. Proposal:** [Arbitrum Growth Circles Event Proposal](https://snapshot.box/#/s:arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0xab1a7ff1a294882315f3beaa77fa0d4b2ec68633792046b941714108209ce737) (Snapshot) - **Date Voted:** February 18, 2025 - **Vote:** For - **Rationale:** I’m voting against this proposal on Snapshot. - Scalable support should answer how it reduces barriers. How many issues get resolved? How does the community self-support? - Measurable impact after an event such as how many builders onboard? How many sign-ups or clicks? Any growth in followers on X or other channels? ---
**Author:** ![Ignas](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/ignas/32/11301_2.png) [@Ignas](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Ignas)\ **Post date:** [February 25, 2025, 7:06am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/ignas-delegate-communication-thread/27208/24 "2025-02-25T07:06:54Z")
**Date Voted:** February 24, 2025 **57. Proposal:** [[CONSTITUTIONAL] AIP: ArbOS Version 40 Callisto](https://snapshot.box/#/s:arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x7cc26491a070c74c1a4ec5a9892571d31eb690015936a35b52c0d3a97bd5497f) (Snapshot) - **Vote:** For - **Rationale:** ArbOS 40 Callisto will keep Arbitrum synced with Ethereum to maintain compatibility. Voted yes of course! **58. Proposal:** [Arbitrum Audit Program](https://snapshot.box/#/s:arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0xebbcad364ae7f02797b9cd7f30c668907d479d4bb5ba7f5d775849822297a01d) (Snapshot) - **Vote:** Against - **Rationale:** As per my previous feedback [here](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/arbitrum-audit-program/28368/27), $100K per audit seems high while most firms charge $30K-80K, with bulk discounts. So a $10M budget needs stricter cost controls. Also, paying in USD instead of ARB would reduce sell pressure. **59. Proposal:** [Request to Increase the Stylus Sprint Committee’s Budget](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/arbitrum/proposal/27831845498978337986467036886891836384283300266814708262424272663046958396151?govId=eip155:42161:0x789fC99093B09aD01C34DC7251D0C89ce743e5a4) (Tally) - **Vote** : For - **Rationale:** Voted For on Tally with same reason on Snapshot. Stylus is key to keeping Arbitrum competitive, increasing the budget to fund more innovative projects makes sense. ---
**Author:** ![Ignas](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/ignas/32/11301_2.png) [@Ignas](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Ignas)\ **Post date:** [March 10, 2025, 10:58am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/ignas-delegate-communication-thread/27208/25 "2025-03-10T10:58:09Z")
**60. Proposal:** [TMC Recommendation](https://snapshot.box/#/s:arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0xc37793b67f39a6af9e9434003205b1d9b67dd6f75638329045257be823da4f18) (Snapshot) - **Date Voted:** March 10, 2025 - **Vote:** #1 Deploy Both Strategies, #2 Only Deploy ARB Strategy, #3 Only Deploy Stable Strategy, #4 Deploy Nothing, Abstain - **Rationale:** With ARB’s price volatility, I know picking just one strategy isn’t easy. I lean toward deploying both, but only if we reassess in 3 months to ensure it’s the right move. This choice isn’t just about market swings. Like other delegates, I see it this way: - Deploy ARB Strategy: Keeps ARB’s upside, avoids sell pressure. - Deploy Stable Strategy: Gives the DAO a stable reserve, typically lower risk than on-chain yield strategies. ---
**Author:** ![Ignas](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/ignas/32/11301_2.png) [@Ignas](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Ignas)\ **Post date:** [March 18, 2025, 10:47am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/ignas-delegate-communication-thread/27208/26 "2025-03-18T10:47:37Z")
**Date Voted:** March 17, 2025 **61. Proposal:** [[CONSTITUTIONAL] - Adopt Timeboost + Nova Fee Sweep](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/arbitrum/proposal/14881197137069494959448952699217598923721993392617887469969318742509097999570?govId=eip155:42161:0xf07DeD9dC292157749B6Fd268E37DF6EA38395B9) (Tally) - **Vote:** For - **Rationale:** Sticking with my decision from the snapshot vote. Timeboost can bring extra revenue for the DAO instead of just relying on transaction fees. **62. Proposal:** [[NON-CONSTITUTIONAL] Arbitrum Onboarding V2: A Governance Bootcamp](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/arbitrum/proposal/41764616447638715300612914863093416410063619332654034338488569044333128121381?govId=eip155:42161:0x789fC99093B09aD01C34DC7251D0C89ce743e5a4) (Tally) - **Vote:** Against - **Rationale:** I voted in favor during the Snapshot vote, but I voted against onchain. Well I still think this proposal could help improve DAO participation in the long run. ---
**Author:** ![Ignas](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/ignas/32/11301_2.png) [@Ignas](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Ignas)\ **Post date:** [March 25, 2025, 7:28am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/ignas-delegate-communication-thread/27208/27 "2025-03-25T07:28:51Z")
**Date Voted:** March 24, 2025 **63. Proposal:** [GMC’s Preferred Allocations (7,500 ETH)](https://snapshot.box/#/s:arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0xf9fd09839ad10b0bb16c97a1cc4618270ed4145a38561da35ac4afe84516a107) (Snapshot) - **Vote:** For - **Rationale:** This is a good way to use the treasury: diversifying revenue while supporting the ecosystem. I’m all for it. **64. Proposal:** [[CONSTITUTIONAL] Proposal: For Arbitrum DAO to register the Sky Custom Gateway contracts in the Router](https://snapshot.box/#/s:arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0xdb22a77942eddfea9c826790ac03c3e54a34716c0a9bde846399cffe6046d256) (Snapshot) - **Vote:** For - **Rationale:** I support this proposal since I don’t see any big risks or extra costs for the DAO. I’m not super technical too, but I can see that this will make bridging USDS and sUSDS smoother for users through the official Arbitrum Bridge. Better UX is always a win **65. Proposal:** [[NON-CONSTITUTIONAL] Arbitrum Audit Program](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/arbitrum/proposal/107606727309922720763027677505427395647796047780305505879344344641224024948240?govId=eip155:42161:0x789fC99093B09aD01C34DC7251D0C89ce743e5a4) (Tally) - **Vote:** For - **Rationale:** Although I see the cost is high compared to industry standards, I believe this program could bring real value to Arbitrum by attracting and securing quality projects. I initially voted no on Snapshot due to budget concerns, but after further consideration, I support it on Tally. Hoping the DAO ensures cost efficiency and accountability as it moves forward. ---
**Author:** ![Ignas](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/ignas/32/11301_2.png) [@Ignas](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Ignas)\ **Post date:** [April 1, 2025, 3:06am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/ignas-delegate-communication-thread/27208/28 "2025-04-01T03:06:42Z")
**Date Voted:** March 31, 2025 **66. Proposal:** [TMC Stablecoin Recommendation](https://snapshot.box/#/s:arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0xdd38e103e337b9e02a9d9ac73c2587db5be6cfb46506e13c0e897f7331895cf4) (Snapshot) - **Vote:** YES, Deploy Stablecoin Strategy - **Rationale:** Just want to add a little since most of my thoughts have already been covered [TMC’s Proposed Allocations - #43 by Ignas](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/tmc-s-proposed-allocations/28522/43) **67. Proposal:** [TMC ARB Recommendation](https://snapshot.box/#/s:arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x9d13c56f911796a578812959f775092b3644901be17738a2d41c516d8a8f2e9b) (Snapshot) - **Vote:** NO, Deploy Nothing - **Rationale:** While the proposal introduces potential yield strategies for the treasury but after carefully reviewing the two service providers and the current market conditions, I’m voting NO, Deploy Nothing this proposal. **68. Proposal:** [OpCo – Oversight and Transparency Committee (OAT) Elections](https://snapshot.box/#/s:arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0xb422848b0f53f9077444b922d553618e331f9abe7539ae4566ff84364d0fbd3c) (Snapshot) - **Vote:** 100% MarcZeller - **Rationale:** Voted for Marc Zeller for the OpCo - Oversight and Transparency Committee. He knows governance, treasury, and strategy inside out, making him a huge asset to Arbitrum. Plus, his vision for efficiency and transparency is exactly what OpCo needs. Confident he’ll do a great job! ---
**Author:** ![Ignas](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/ignas/32/11301_2.png) [@Ignas](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Ignas)\ **Post date:** [April 2, 2025, 12:36pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/ignas-delegate-communication-thread/27208/29 "2025-04-02T12:36:38Z")
**70. Proposal:** [[Non-constitutional] ARB Incentives: User Acquisition for dApps & Protocols](https://snapshot.box/#/s:arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x7689f957c8cc37e991c7bed0f1d3dd3f6024a921b0bfbae5c897a09ab45c538b) (Snapshot) - **Date Voted:** April 2, 2025 - **Vote:** For - **Rationale:** Again, user acquisition is always a top priority for any project, even in Web2 business. After consideration, I think this proposal can offer a good chance to boost Arbitrum’s growth by supporting various projects with clear KPIs and measurable results. ---
**Author:** ![Ignas](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/ignas/32/11301_2.png) [@Ignas](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Ignas)\ **Post date:** [April 15, 2025, 8:09am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/ignas-delegate-communication-thread/27208/30 "2025-04-15T08:09:39Z")
**71. Proposal:** [Security Council Member Election](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/arbitrum/council/security-council/election/3/round-2) (Tally) - **Date Voted:** April 14, 2025 - **Vote:** MartinGbz - **Rationale:** I’m voting for MartinGbz because I trust his hands on experience with securing and managing high value transactions at Aave. ---
**Author:** ![Ignas](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/ignas/32/11301_2.png) [@Ignas](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Ignas)\ **Post date:** [May 6, 2025, 8:22am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/ignas-delegate-communication-thread/27208/31 "2025-05-06T08:22:50Z")
**Date Voted:** May 5, 2025 **72. Proposal:** [Approval of STEP 2 Committee’s Preferred Allocation](https://snapshot.box/#/s:arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0xd67d17db3bd230b163ce1f791d8712812446bced14ef2de875fd01ab3e2be3d6) (Snapshot) - **Vote:** For - **Rationale:** I’ll be voting YES on this proposal. **73. Proposal:** [[Non-consitutional]: Top-up for Hackathon Continuation Program](https://snapshot.box/#/s:arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0xbb7500b713ccf4eff3f2dcb61e3c9d8db5ed5628a4b2f891656a0c0de98907bd) (Snapshot) - **Vote:** Yes to both - **Rationale:** I support this proposal to top-up the HCP and transfer the remaining funds to the TMC. > [@Proposal \[Non-consitutional\]: Top-up for Hackathon Continuation Program](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/proposal-non-consitutional-top-up-for-hackathon-continuation-program/29064/6): > > > [@Proposal \[Non-consitutional\]: Top-up for Hackathon Continuation Program](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/proposal-non-consitutional-top-up-for-hackathon-continuation-program/29064/1): > > > > Is this a precedent? > > > > The funds left over from Season 1 of the Domain Allocator programs are due to be returned to the DAO. Authorising a transfer to the MSS for usage in the Hackathon Continuation Program (HCP) (while the rest of the funds are sent to the DAO/AF) would be a one-time action that would provide timely reassurance to the HCP projects. Given that the rest of the funds would be returned, this approach would not become a recurring mechanism in the DAO. > > I agree with this. It’s not about setting a precedent, I think it’s flexible solution to a situation no one wanted. The most important thing here is maintaining Arbitrum DAO’s trust with developers. > > But let’s circle back, this happened because funds were in ARB while expenses were in USD. No stablecoin conversion was done. That delay felt more like speculation than risk management, tbh. > > Going forward, I think DAO should require that X% of any USD based grant be swapped to stable within Y days of receiving funds. That’s risk control I think will work. > > I also wonder, what if there’s no leftover fund next time? Who covers the shortfall? > > Maybe it’s time we set up an emergency reserve fund. We got lucky this time with unused Domain Allocator funds, but we can’t rely on luck forever. > > I support this proposal, just let’s make sure it’s a one time solution, and a learning moment to tighten how we handle funding risks. ---
**Author:** ![Ignas](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/ignas/32/11301_2.png) [@Ignas](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Ignas)\ **Post date:** [May 13, 2025, 5:47am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/ignas-delegate-communication-thread/27208/32 "2025-05-13T05:47:26Z")
**Date Voted:** May 12, 2025 **74. Proposal:** [The Watchdog: Arbitrum DAO’s Grant Misuse Bounty Program](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/arbitrum/proposal/28485587559812799913134094629469849411398475232393607771326861344548198896843?govId=eip155:42161:0x789fC99093B09aD01C34DC7251D0C89ce743e5a4) (Tally) - **Vote:** For - **Rationale:** I voted in favor on Snapshot and will continue to support this proposal onchain. > [@The Watchdog: Arbitrum DAO's Grant Misuse Bounty Program](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/the-watchdog-arbitrum-daos-grant-misuse-bounty-program/27978/1): > > On a case by case basis, if all attempts at backchanneling fail and the accused party is nonresponsive, the report may be posted to the forum with all the watcher’s personal and identifiable information redacted in the version posted publicly. Additionally, on a case by case basis, the committee may decide to post a summary of a grant misuse report to inform the DAO of certain incidents. Otherwise individual reports will not be posted to the forum directly. I agree but wanted to add one point, in high level cases involving large-scale abuse, after internal efforts fail, we could also consider posting the accused party’s info on social media so other DAOs or ecosystem partners can blacklist them. I don’t think this is overreacting, it’s about protecting our partners and and the whole space from bad actors 🙂 ---
**Author:** ![Ignas](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/ignas/32/11301_2.png) [@Ignas](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Ignas)\ **Post date:** [May 22, 2025, 7:07am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/ignas-delegate-communication-thread/27208/33 "2025-05-22T07:07:44Z")
**Date Voted:** May 20, 2025 **75. Proposal:** [DeFi Renaissance Incentive Program (DRIP)](https://snapshot.box/#/s:arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x0b62de171fbff7a81833f9ebb44b9747189264d7a2cf95e3446223b1c413d2b0) (Snapshot) - **Vote:** For - **Rationale:** I’m voting Yes because DRIP brings a focused, measurable approach to growing DeFi on Arbitrum with clear targets and short test seasons. **76. Proposal:** [[CONSTITUTIONAL] AIP: ArbOS Version 40 CallistoVote onchain](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/arbitrum/proposal/13108804573775967668959825241666341617107666532012387058509418598838035461528?govId=eip155:42161:0xf07DeD9dC292157749B6Fd268E37DF6EA38395B9) (Tally) - **Vote:** For - **Rationale:** Sticking my support with Snapshot vote. ArbOS 40 Callisto will keep Arbitrum synced with Ethereum to maintain compatibility. ---
**Author:** ![Ignas](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/ignas/32/11301_2.png) [@Ignas](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Ignas)\ **Post date:** [May 27, 2025, 7:47am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/ignas-delegate-communication-thread/27208/34 "2025-05-27T07:47:58Z")
**77. Proposal:** [[Constitutional] AIP: Constitutional Quorum Threshold Reduction](https://snapshot.box/#/s:arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x2d4089d72617eb137d6ee7ab9ae9efbe3cd1e0fcff48df24b926ce6259b734d3) (Snapshot) - **Date Voted:** May 26, 2025 - **Vote:** For - **Rationale:** I’m voting Yes because reducing the quorum from 5% to 4.5% helps prevent good proposals from failing due to low turnout, especially when many delegates are losing VP or disengaging. ---
**Author:** ![Ignas](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/ignas/32/11301_2.png) [@Ignas](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Ignas)\ **Post date:** [June 3, 2025, 8:57am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/ignas-delegate-communication-thread/27208/35 "2025-06-03T08:57:50Z")
**Date Voted:** June 2, 2025 **78. Proposal:** [Wind Down the MSS + Transfer Payment Responsibilities to the Arbitrum Foundation](https://snapshot.box/#/s:arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x1de2707ab4cf792721544a8f82eee98535c16ce437ba2ac95a78c85c20b6d8b0) (Snapshot) - **Vote:** For - **Rationale:** I am voting yes on this proposal. I believe this is a timely and necessary step to avoid any more unnecessary waste. **79. Proposal** : [Adjust the Voting Power of the Arbitrum Community Pool & Ratify the Agentic Governance Pivot](https://snapshot.box/#/s:arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x9ea3f5ef5b6c838ffc24430bb927baa13bf25dcf5f444358e89f0958bb41a5e7) (Snapshot) - **Vote** : B - Reduce delegation to 100K - **Rationale:** EH’s delegation has moved away from its original goal, and this is a lack of alignment that concerns me. > [@\[RFC\] Proposal to Adjust the Voting Power of the Arbitrum Community Pool & Ratifying the Agentic Governance Pivot](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/rfc-proposal-to-adjust-the-voting-power-of-the-arbitrum-community-pool-ratifying-the-agentic-governance-pivot/29280/11): > > So the original 7M ARB was meant to empower human voters, but shifting to AI agents is a fundamental change that was never formally approved by the DAO? EH’s delegation has drifted from its original purpose, and this lack of alignment is concerning to me tbh. > > I appreciate Event Horizon’s efforts, but using AI agents to vote on behalf of the DAO raises serious questions, particularly around transparency. We don’t have a clear understanding of how these agents make decisions, what values guide them, or where to see their voting record. > > However, based on what I’ve seen over nearly a year in Arbitrum, EH has not caused any harm to the DAO with the 7M ARB delegation. And according to [AI agent governance: Big challenges, big opportunities](https://www.ibm.com/think/insights/ai-agent-governance), agentic governance does offer certain advantages, such as fast response times and automated voting based on predefined criteria. I’m leaning toward option B, but maybe with a slightly higher delegation (like 500K or 1M ARB), along with: > > - A clear explanation of how the agents work > - The logic or principles behind their decisions > - A public dashboard showing their vote history > > Before pulling all the voting power or fully backing this new model, the DAO deserves clarity 🙂 ---
**Author:** ![Ignas](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/ignas/32/11301_2.png) [@Ignas](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Ignas)\ **Post date:** [June 10, 2025, 7:24am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/ignas-delegate-communication-thread/27208/36 "2025-06-10T07:24:47Z")
**Date Voted:** June 9, 2025 **80. Proposal:** [Reallocate Redeemed USDM Funds to STEP 2 Budget](https://snapshot.box/#/s:arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0xfd373c58adbb013a05c778b71ccffb19e5bbefb8a100232f67eced33c58e22f7) (Snapshot) - **Vote:** For - **Rationale:** Voting For. This is anefficient administrative action. It puts idle USDC back to work in yield bearing RWA allocations already approved by the DAO. No new funds needed, and it supports the long term sustainability strategy of STEP 2. **81. Proposal:** [DeFi Renaissance Incentive Program (DRIP)](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/arbitrum/proposal/13050485773425645466153415888358064378805606653363056526521393182333458879398?govId=eip155:42161:0x789fC99093B09aD01C34DC7251D0C89ce743e5a4) (Tally) - **Vote:** For - **Rationale:** Sticking my support on Tally. ---
**Author:** ![Ignas](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/ignas/32/11301_2.png) [@Ignas](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Ignas)\ **Post date:** [June 17, 2025, 9:17am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/ignas-delegate-communication-thread/27208/37 "2025-06-17T09:17:02Z")
**Date Voted:** June 16, 2025 **82. Proposal:** [Updating the OpCo Foundation’s Operational Capability](https://snapshot.box/#/s:arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x65b2b835f03bc18aa401b88702145e6b7686e8d7ddddfd956837251f8a7a7da1) (Snapshot) - **Vote:** For - **Rationale:** I’m voting YES. **83. Proposal:** [Let’s improve our governance forum with three proposals.app feature integrations](http://snapshot.box/#/s:arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x38663c36b26252acff6c6ca43663167858f51f960235dc0441bd2ad4a8f66fb1) (Snapshot) - **Vote** : For - **Rationale:** Voted yes. This proposal brings real improvements to how delegates and community members engage with governance. ---
**Author:** ![Ignas](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/ignas/32/11301_2.png) [@Ignas](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Ignas)\ **Post date:** [June 24, 2025, 7:24am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/ignas-delegate-communication-thread/27208/38 "2025-06-24T07:24:30Z")
**Date Voted:** June 23, 2025 **84. Proposal:** [[Constitutional] AIP: Remove Cost Cap on Arbitrum Nova](https://snapshot.box/#/s:arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0xeb044e3bdeba71e74dea02abeab4c33fe4bf5ab9def50082863702d5e2112b93) (Snapshot) - **Vote:** For - **Rationale:** Support the proposal. **85. Proposal:** [Arbitrum Treasury Management Council - Consolidating Efforts](https://snapshot.box/#/s:arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0xfab795313df4ef1023c5f7f9027857637cc3841d62dc0b54796fbfa5f8096919) (Snapshot) - **Vote:** For - **Rationale:** Voting yes to adopt the Arbitrum Treasury Management Council (ATMC) as the unified structure for treasury oversight. **86. Proposal:** [[CONSTITUTIONAL] Register the Sky Custom Gateway contracts in the Router](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/arbitrum/proposal/71020107401388505040510993373598301285550678565865201408741893567942851985019?govId=eip155:42161:0xf07DeD9dC292157749B6Fd268E37DF6EA38395B9) (Tally) - **Vote:** For - **Rationale:** Voted yes with same reason on Snapshot. I don’t see any big risks or extra costs for the DAO. I’m not super technical too, but I can see that this will make bridging USDS and sUSDS smoother for users through the official Arbitrum Bridge. **87. Proposal:** [[Constitutional] AIP: Constitutional Quorum Threshold Reduction](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/arbitrum/proposal/94423886836435773843507976898262621297544156552971145658873213763398017341229?govId=eip155:42161:0xf07DeD9dC292157749B6Fd268E37DF6EA38395B9) (Tally) - **Vote:** For - **Rationale:** Support the proposal with same reason on Snapshot. ---
**Author:** ![Ignas](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/ignas/32/11301_2.png) [@Ignas](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Ignas)\ **Post date:** [July 2, 2025, 7:39am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/ignas-delegate-communication-thread/27208/39 "2025-07-02T07:39:36Z")
**Date Voted:** June 30, 2025 **88. Proposal:** [Audit Committee Technical Expert Elections](https://snapshot.box/#/s:arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x131574819442cb6da293795ee9faeec4754a5af664b535b654b3d9d3d53f47e1) (Snapshot) - **Vote:** 50% for Gustavo, 50% for Andrei - **Rationale:** Both candidates bring exceptional technical expertise and relevant experience that would greatly benefit the Arbitrum Audit Program :). **89. Proposal:** [Extend AGV Council Term and Align Future Elections with Operational Cadence](https://snapshot.box/#/s:arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0xd7529f75df21183d0eb9bce0cc828d56e9a100f449857c16177d98db6497cc16) (Snapshot) - **Vote:** For - **Rationale:** Support extending the current AGV Council’s term through the end of 2025. A mid-year transition during active execution would disrupt momentum and set the program back. Maintaining continuity at this stage is the right call. ---
**Author:** ![Ignas](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/ignas/32/11301_2.png) [@Ignas](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Ignas)\ **Post date:** [July 8, 2025, 7:17am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/ignas-delegate-communication-thread/27208/40 "2025-07-08T07:17:21Z")
**90. Proposal:** [Arbitrum Research and Development Collective V2 - Extension](https://snapshot.box/#/s:arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x765b297702f21736e7b52c23d781dc76968519fef9c7b1ca1f924d167b2a6899) (Snapshot) - **Date Voted:** July 7, 2025 - **Vote:** Extend ARDC V2 - **Rationale:** Supporting the extension of ARDC V2 ensures continuity in critical research, risk, and security work without disruption. The framework is already approved and extending avoids unnecessary delays or overhead. [Previous page](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/ignas-delegate-communication-thread/27208.md?page=1) [Next page](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/ignas-delegate-communication-thread/27208.md?page=3)