# JuanRah - Delegate Communication Thread

**URL:** <https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/juanrah-delegate-communication-thread/27395>\
**Category:** Delegate Statements\
**Created:** [November 1, 2024, 11:47pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/juanrah-delegate-communication-thread/27395 "2024-11-01T23:47:53Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 8

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Juanrah](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/juanrah/32/10393_2.png) [@Juanrah](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Juanrah)\
**Post date:** [November 23, 2024, 5:08am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/juanrah-delegate-communication-thread/27395/8 "2024-11-23T05:08:31Z")

</div>

# [Proposal for Financial Restitution For ArbitrumDAO Grant Winners](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/proposal-for-financial-restitution-for-arbitrumdao-grant-winners/27020)

> [@Proposal for Financial Restitution For ArbitrumDAO Grant Winners](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/proposal-for-financial-restitution-for-arbitrumdao-grant-winners/27020/78):
>
> After consideration, I believe that the DAO should focus on improving its future processes rather than providing retroactive compensation for past administrative delays. I’m echoing this argument: I understand that the delays caused frustration and challenges for the grantees but compensating them with additional funds is not the appropriate solution. The amount requested to counterbalance the inconvenience is subjective and as @404DAO commented, it sets a problematic precedent. Deploying extr…

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/juanrah-delegate-communication-thread/27395)._
