# Lampros DAO Delegate Communication Thread **URL:** \ **Category:** Delegate Statements\ **Tags:** delegation, delegate-statements\ **Created:** [September 5, 2024, 6:25am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/lampros-dao-delegate-communication-thread/26642 "2024-09-05T06:25:53Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 2
**Author:** ![Euphoria](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/euphoria/32/14303_2.png) [@Euphoria](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Euphoria)\ **Post date:** [September 5, 2024, 6:38am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/lampros-dao-delegate-communication-thread/26642/2 "2024-09-05T06:38:48Z")
# Snapshot Votes * * * 1. [[Constitutional] Extend Delay on L2Time Lock](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x75d1aff7adb317bb629a334fba748fdd6ddac5ba1e64870b8abb4a12d6ed5a6f) Voted - FOR Reason - > [@Constitutional - Extend Delay on L2Time Lock](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/constitutional-extend-delay-on-l2time-lock/26470/28): > > The following reflects the views of the Lampros Labs DAO governance team, composed of @Blueweb, @Euphoria, and @Nyx, based on our combined research and analysis. > > We vote in favour of this proposal. > > The proposed increase in the timelock delay for core upgrades is a positive step, aligning with the direction L2s are moving towards. This change follows L2Beat’s recommendations, and the shift from red to yellow status is a good signal for Arbitrum. > > We went through the L2Beat website and noticed that zkSync Lite already has a yellow slice, so joining them in this status would be beneficial. > > We also believe it’s important to define emergency situations clearly and as much as possible with current knowledge. This will help the Security Council make more informed and deterministic decisions when needed. * * * 1. [STIP-Bridge Operational Budget](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x92b4ac07fbadbb32c30f502880c4dfb1c4882c32d6ae84c2307f9f01dec079c7) Voted - FOR Reason - > [@STIP-Bridge Operational Budget](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/stip-bridge-operational-budget/26489/23): > > The following reflects the views of the Lampros Labs DAO governance team, composed of @Blueweb, @Euphoria, and @Nyx, based on our combined research, analysis and ideation. > > We vote in favour of this proposal. > > The work done by the advisors was really helpful in making the process smooth and efficient. The Program Manager did a great job in coordinating everything, which kept things on track. > > Since the funds were already approved, it’s easy to vote in favor of this proposal. * * * 1. [[Replace Oversight Committee with MSS] Delegate to Voter Enfranchisement Pool — Event Horizon](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0xc6cb49223880ff49077d74260c44845ed18c3a1825a9a3941af454106f700c50) Voted - FOR - Replace with MSS Reason - > [@Delegate to a public access, public good citizen enfranchisement pool through Event Horizon](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/delegate-to-a-public-access-public-good-citizen-enfranchisement-pool-through-event-horizon/21523/93): > > The following reflects the views of the Lampros Labs DAO governance team, composed of @Blueweb, @Euphoria, and @Nyx, based on our combined research, analysis and ideation. > > We’re voting FOR this change to the original proposal in the Snapshot temperature check. > > We support MSS taking over the responsibilities from the Oversight Committee. > > This does not yet support the main proposal for which the on-chain voting is in the process; we will consider our vote on that one separately and post our thoughts here later. * * * # Tally Votes * * * 1. [ARB Staking: Unlock ARB Utility and Align Governance](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/arbitrum/proposal/52793687237294107439411688810483120161857085958258363826553939061522164665920) Voted - FOR Reason - > [@ARB Staking: Unlock ARB Utility and Align Governance](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/arb-staking-unlock-arb-utility-and-align-governance/25084/160): > > The following reflects the views of the Lampros Labs DAO governance team, composed of @Blueweb, @Euphoria, and @Nyx, based on our combined research, analysis and ideation. > > We’re voting FOR this proposal on Tally. > > What stands out to us is the transparency and level of detail in the proposal. The potential impact of ARB staking appears to fully justify the requested funding. The introduction of ARB staking and stARB provides a valuable way to strengthen governance while allowing token holders to capture value. The data provided highlights the need for stronger governance and DeFi support, and we believe that improving governance participation in this way is a step in the right direction. * * * 1. [Funds to bootstrap the first BoLD validator](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/arbitrum/proposal/30828395120264250515588826110157291466999820796280987022346439005676672544691) Voted - FOR Reason - > [@AIP: Funds to bootstrap the first BoLD validator](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/aip-funds-to-bootstrap-the-first-bold-validator/24506/41): > > The following reflects the views of the Lampros Labs DAO governance team, composed of @Blueweb, @Euphoria, and @Nyx, based on our combined research, analysis and ideation. > > We’re voting FOR this proposal on Tally. > > Our team doesn’t have much experience with the technical aspects mentioned in the proposal. We’re learning and trying to understand them better. > > However, after hearing the proposal on the governance call and reading through the comments on this post, we believe it makes sense to have the first BoLD validator. * * * --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/lampros-dao-delegate-communication-thread/26642)._