# Lampros DAO Delegate Communication Thread **URL:** \ **Category:** Delegate Statements\ **Tags:** delegation, delegate-statements\ **Created:** [September 5, 2024, 6:25am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/lampros-dao-delegate-communication-thread/26642 "2024-09-05T06:25:53Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 22
**Author:** ![Euphoria](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/euphoria/32/14303_2.png) [@Euphoria](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Euphoria)\ **Post date:** [February 26, 2025, 9:42am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/lampros-dao-delegate-communication-thread/26642/22 "2025-02-26T09:42:49Z")
# Snapshot Votes * * * 1. **[[CONSTITUTIONAL] AIP: ArbOS Version 40 Callisto](https://snapshot.box/#/s:arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x7cc26491a070c74c1a4ec5a9892571d31eb690015936a35b52c0d3a97bd5497f)** **Voted - FOR** **Reason -** > [@\[CONSTITUTIONAL\] AIP: ArbOS Version 40 Callisto](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/constitutional-aip-arbos-version-40-callisto/28436/22): > > The following reflects the views of the Lampros DAO governance team, composed of Chain\_L (@Blueweb), @Euphoria, and Hirangi Pandya (@Nyx), based on our combined research, analysis, and ideation. > > We are voting FOR this proposal in the Snapshot voting. > > We support the ArbOS 40 Callisto upgrade as it ensures Arbitrum stays in sync with Ethereum’s upcoming Pectra upgrades and key EIPs. This upgrade will improve functionality, security, and developer experience while keeping the ecosystem efficient and future-ready. * * * 1. **[Arbitrum Audit Program](https://snapshot.box/#/s:arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0xebbcad364ae7f02797b9cd7f30c668907d479d4bb5ba7f5d775849822297a01d)** **Voted - FOR** **Reason -** > [@Arbitrum Audit Program](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/arbitrum-audit-program/28368/63): > > The following reflects the views of the Lampros DAO governance team, composed of Chain\_L (@Blueweb), @Euphoria, and Hirangi Pandya (@Nyx), based on our combined research, analysis, and ideation. > > We are voting FOR this proposal in the Snapshot voting. > > We attended both office hours for this proposal and, after reviewing the details, we believe this initiative is worth funding. We support initiatives that remove financial barriers for new projects. Many early-stage teams struggle to secure funding, and audits are one of the most expensive yet essential steps before launching. > > Looking at the ADPC’s Security Subsidy Fund Report, we see strong demand for such programs. In just 8 weeks of the program, ADPC received a competitive number of applications from teams. Extending this support for a full year makes sense given the clear demand and potential impact on ecosystem growth. > > > [@Arbitrum Audit Program](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/arbitrum-audit-program/28368/59): > > > > the nature of protocols who could apply. Understanding that this proposal has a growth nature, we need to clarify if current protocols in arbitrum can apply, if protocols migrating/expanding from other chains can apply. And the answer likely can’t just be a single “yes” otherwise everybody who has to do an audit in arbitrum will come here making life of the committee miserable, there has to be some sort of wording on whom can apply > > We also agree with @JoJo’s point that clear eligibility criteria should be outlined for protocols. It is important to define which protocols can apply to prevent the committee from being overwhelmed with applications. We would like to see these details clarified before the Tally vote. > > And regarding the miscommunication between ADPC and the AF, we believe a structured communication channel between AF and DAO could help with which initiatives they are working on or planning for the future. Whether through monthly Governance Reporting Calls (GRCs) or forum updates, the DAO should be kept informed about ongoing initiatives. This will help avoid such overlapping efforts and improve coordination in the future. * * * # Tally Votes * * * 1. **[Request to Increase the Stylus Sprint Committee’s Budget](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/arbitrum/proposal/27831845498978337986467036886891836384283300266814708262424272663046958396151?govId=eip155:42161:0x789fC99093B09aD01C34DC7251D0C89ce743e5a4)** **Voted - FOR** **Reason -** > [@Request to Increase the Stylus Sprint Committee’s Budget](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/request-to-increase-the-stylus-sprint-committee-s-budget/28312/97): > > The following reflects the views of the Lampros DAO governance team, composed of Chain\_L (@Blueweb), @Euphoria, and Hirangi Pandya (@Nyx), based on our combined research, analysis, and ideation. > > We are voting FOR this proposal in the Tally voting. > > We stand by our stance from the [Snapshot vote](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/request-to-increase-the-stylus-sprint-committee-s-budget/28312/63) and believe it is better to fund these high-quality projects selected by the committee than to leave them unfunded. Delaying their funding to a future round could slow down the growth and adoption of Stylus, affecting its momentum. By supporting these projects now, we enable more teams to build, experiment, and contribute to the ecosystem, ensuring continued progress without unnecessary setbacks. > > We look forward to seeing the impact of these funded projects and how they contribute to the growth of Stylus and the broader Arbitrum ecosystem. --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/lampros-dao-delegate-communication-thread/26642)._