# Lampros DAO Delegate Communication Thread

**URL:** https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/lampros-dao-delegate-communication-thread/26642
**Category:** Delegate Statements
**Tags:** delegation, delegate-statements
**Created:** [September 5, 2024, 6:25am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/lampros-dao-delegate-communication-thread/26642 "2024-09-05T06:25:53Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 27

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Euphoria](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/euphoria/32/14303_2.png) [@Euphoria](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Euphoria)
#### Post date: [May 5, 2025, 7:01am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/lampros-dao-delegate-communication-thread/26642/27 "2025-05-05T07:01:26Z")

</div>

# Snapshot Votes

* * *

1. **[Approval of STEP 2 Committee’s Preferred Allocations](https://snapshot.box/#/s:arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0xd67d17db3bd230b163ce1f791d8712812446bced14ef2de875fd01ab3e2be3d6)**  
**Voted - FOR**  
**Reason -**

> [@STEP 2 Committee Preferred Allocations](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/step-2-committee-preferred-allocations/29086/11):
>
> The following reflects the views of the Lampros DAO governance team, composed of Chain\_L (@Blueweb), @Euphoria, and Hirangi Pandya (@Nyx), based on our combined research, analysis, and ideation.
> 
> We are voting FOR this proposal in the Snapshot voting.
> 
> We trust the committee’s judgment in selecting partners for this round, given their thorough evaluation and strategic focus on stability, liquidity, and risk-adjusted setups.
> 
> Building on the success of STEP v1, which delivered strong outcomes, we believe this continued approach will strengthen Arbitrum’s long-term growth and competitive position. The committee’s focus on RWAs and overcoming compliance challenges also reflects a forward-thinking strategy to differentiate Arbitrum in the ecosystem.

* * *

1. **[[Non-consitutional]: Top-up for Hackathon Continuation Program](https://snapshot.box/#/s:arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0xbb7500b713ccf4eff3f2dcb61e3c9d8db5ed5628a4b2f891656a0c0de98907bd)**  
**Voted - Yes to both**  
**Reason -**

> [@Proposal \[Non-consitutional\]: Top-up for Hackathon Continuation Program](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/proposal-non-consitutional-top-up-for-hackathon-continuation-program/29064/35):
>
> The following reflects the views of the Lampros DAO governance team, composed of Chain\_L (@Blueweb), @Euphoria, and Hirangi Pandya (@Nyx), based on our combined research, analysis, and ideation.
> 
> We are voting “Yes to both” in the Snapshot voting.
> 
> We are in favour of both topping up and moving leftover funds into the hands of TMC. As we’ve previously expressed, we view this reallocation as a practical response to a time-sensitive funding shortfall, made even more reasonable by the fact that it utilizes unspent, already-allocated funds, avoiding the need to convert additional DAO capital in a volatile market.
> 
> That said, this proposal highlights an important operational lesson, the need for standardized, pre-approved mechanisms, such as those that can potentially be handled via the TMC, to address minor or urgent funding gaps without requiring full governance cycles.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/lampros-dao-delegate-communication-thread/26642)._