# Larva Delegate Communication Thread

**URL:** <https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/larva-delegate-communication-thread/24476>\
**Category:** Delegate Statements\
**Tags:** delegation, delegate-statements\
**Created:** [May 27, 2024, 3:46pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/larva-delegate-communication-thread/24476 "2024-05-27T15:46:40Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 105

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Larva](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/larva/32/1896_2.png) [@Larva](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Larva)\
**Post date:** [December 13, 2024, 11:06am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/larva-delegate-communication-thread/24476/105 "2024-12-13T11:06:35Z")

</div>

**Voting** 2024-12-12T16:00:00Z

**[Snapshot] [OpCo – A DAO-adjacent Entity for Strategy Execution](https://snapshot.box/#/s:arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x8298874cdf0e0a1849cc02eefd3bc7d94c6868c560774df963318a5edd39a53f) - Voted For**

I completely agree with the view that ‘as it currently stands, the Arbitrum DAO is generally unable to move swiftly when it requires specialized contributors to execute a strategy, for which there isn’t a straightforward and low-friction approach, with these processes typically requiring a vast amount of effort from the supply side instead of being driven by the demand side.’ I very hope OpCo can address this pain point.

I was concerned that a 34M ARB would put a lot of pressure on the market, to the detriment of ARB holders, and OpCo decided to take a linear release to minimize the impact on the market. Overall, the pros of the proposal outweigh the cons, so I voted For.

[My comments in original proposal](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/partner-with-eth-bucharest-2025-eastern-europe-s-leading-ethereum-conference-and-hackathon/27606/3)

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/larva-delegate-communication-thread/24476)._
