# Larva Delegate Communication Thread

**URL:** <https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/larva-delegate-communication-thread/24476>\
**Category:** Delegate Statements\
**Tags:** delegation, delegate-statements\
**Created:** [May 27, 2024, 3:46pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/larva-delegate-communication-thread/24476 "2024-05-27T15:46:40Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 76

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Larva](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/larva/32/1896_2.png) [@Larva](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Larva)\
**Post date:** [October 11, 2024, 10:42am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/larva-delegate-communication-thread/24476/76 "2024-10-11T10:42:52Z")

</div>

**Voting** 2024-10-10T16:00:00Z

**[Snapshot] [Establishing a DAO Events Budget for 2025](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0xdfe7bf7e5bc227fc06765f37d9d9ecd1371e637b93b574ae4cc4c1d345cd648f) - Voted Against**

It’s necessary to establish an event budget in advance for 2025 since the DAO has just approved a proposal for offline events. However, the question is, did we participate in these events mentioned for 2024, and what were the expenses and outcomes? I didn’t see clear data in the proposal. Without this information, how was the $1.5 million budget for this proposal determined? I’m puzzled by this figure, and this is a key issue we often encounter when it comes to budget-related proposals—we don’t know whether the amount is too much or too little. Therefore, I believe the proposer should provide supplementary data on the 2024 activities for the delegates’ reference. So I voted Against.

[My comments in original proposal](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/establishing-a-dao-events-budget-for-2025/26734/25)

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/larva-delegate-communication-thread/24476)._