# M&A for Arbitrum DAO **URL:** \ **Category:** Archived Proposals\ **Tags:** proposal, governance\ **Created:** [April 15, 2024, 11:04am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/m-a-for-arbitrum-dao/23205 "2024-04-15T11:04:01Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 15
**Author:** ![MinistroDolar](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/ministrodolar/32/6167_2.png) [@MinistroDolar](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/MinistroDolar)\ **Post date:** [April 23, 2024, 1:28pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/m-a-for-arbitrum-dao/23205/15 "2024-04-23T13:28:37Z")
Hi @Bernard I like the proposal, I think as you have illustrated there may be opportunities (especially in terms of acquisitions) for Arbitrum DAO and it seems to be a good approach to be prepared for this. I have some doubts that maybe you could answer: - Who gets the 3% advisory fee? - Do you have any details on how to reach 600k of estimated expenses for M&A Unit Mgmt. Co? - I understand that the DAO would be part of the organization as a Limited Partner, can the DAO have this role in a company legally speaking? (it is a very specific question I know, but I don’t know the legal details). > [@Bernard](#): > > With regards to checks and balances from the DAO, we propose that the total fund amount is held within the DAO’s treasury but is earmarked for use by the M&A Unit. - Correct me if necessary, but wouldn’t this generate the need to vote in Tally every time the entity wants to use funds for any acquisition? Finally, I would like to see in the proposal mechanisms to exclude/replace any member of the “Arbitrum DAO Steering Committee” if necessary, not only for any bad performance but also because the proposal aims to last at least 2 years, which is quite a long time. --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/m-a-for-arbitrum-dao/23205)._