What is the relevance of battle testings as defined by removals from DAO programs? The policies broadly make sense, and the fact that no one has been punished wouldn’t change this. Are you speaking more to the enforceability of the CoC? If that is the case, it should be able to be run and verified in simulation.
Regarding permanent invocation vs continued temporary extension: is there a benefit to an extension or a detriment to simply establishing a permanent CoC, which, like a constitution, is designed to evolve over time?
Further, I’d advocate for the inclusion of a section regarding a DAO-wide privacy expectations / policy as well as formalized meeting and call procedures.
I’ve commented further here: Proposal: enable the new TogetherCrew functionality: Free* summarizer and Q&A for delegates telegram chat - #33 by DonOfDAOs