# \[NON-CONSTITUTIONAL\] Arbitrum Onboarding V2: A Governance Bootcamp **URL:** \ **Category:** Archived Proposals\ **Tags:** proposal, governance\ **Created:** [November 18, 2024, 5:17pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-arbitrum-onboarding-v2-a-governance-bootcamp/27546 "2024-11-18T17:17:01Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 10
**Author:** ![duokongcrypto](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/duokongcrypto/32/13828_2.png) [@duokongcrypto](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/duokongcrypto)\ **Post date:** [November 19, 2024, 5:39am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-arbitrum-onboarding-v2-a-governance-bootcamp/27546/10 "2024-11-19T05:39:48Z")
> [@Onboarding Pilot Program: Final Report (Milestone 3)](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/onboarding-pilot-program-final-report-milestone-3/26046/2): > > I highly appreciate the team that worked on this. Many of the lessons we now know in hindsight, but I want to clearly address them here. The root cause if this problem is there isn’t anything to onboard people to. job placement receiving a grant building infrastructure operations admin I’m a bit confused about the desired output, outcome, and impact expected by the program. I don’t know that retroactive comp is the answer. The real answer may be that people need roles to onboard to - roles … Referring to the previous v1 report and comments, RIKA emphasized: help newbies navigate DAO and make meaningful contributions. It is not our intention to design a program to educate people on how DAO works. We are considering creating workshops and tutorials so that newcomers understand the specific needs of DAO. The new V2 proposal does not clearly explain how the contributions and value of the 10 selected Fellows to the DAO will be measured, such as the number of proposals they contribute to or their governance activity level. Clear key performance indicators (KPIs) are essential. Firstly, we should agree on implementing retrospective compensation policies for onboarding participants who invest significant time and effort to become active DAO members. However, I still have concerns: if, after extensive training, we are unable to retain these representatives, what would be the point of this initiative? I would like to hear your personal thoughts on this, Rika. --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-arbitrum-onboarding-v2-a-governance-bootcamp/27546)._