# \[NON-CONSTITUTIONAL\] Arbitrum Onboarding V2: A Governance Bootcamp

**URL:** <https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-arbitrum-onboarding-v2-a-governance-bootcamp/27546>\
**Category:** Archived Proposals\
**Tags:** proposal, governance\
**Created:** [November 18, 2024, 5:17pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-arbitrum-onboarding-v2-a-governance-bootcamp/27546 "2024-11-18T17:17:01Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 149

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Griff](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/griff/32/964_2.png) [@Griff](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Griff)\
**Post date:** [March 24, 2025, 8:28pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-arbitrum-onboarding-v2-a-governance-bootcamp/27546/149 "2025-03-24T20:28:28Z")

</div>

I’m voting against this proposal. As I said for the Snapshot I would love to see this submitted through questbook,OpCo or some other program, a DAO vote is just overkill for this sort of thing.

I also think in general we would be better served by one person, maybe @RikaGoldberg, taking on a part time role to just help the delegates when they need it on demand… a bootcamp might be overkill.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-arbitrum-onboarding-v2-a-governance-bootcamp/27546)._