# \[NON-CONSTITUTIONAL\] - Arbitrum Research and Development Collective \[Term 2\]

**URL:** <https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-arbitrum-research-and-development-collective-term-2/26922>\
**Category:** Finalized AIPs\
**Created:** [September 24, 2024, 11:17am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-arbitrum-research-and-development-collective-term-2/26922 "2024-09-24T11:17:44Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 86

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TempeTechie](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/tempetechie/32/2730_2.png) [@TempeTechie](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/TempeTechie)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2024, 3:42am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-arbitrum-research-and-development-collective-term-2/26922/86 "2024-11-06T03:42:06Z")

</div>

I voted FOR this proposal on Tally, especially based on how well ARDC v1 performed with the STIP analysis. The proposed budget is the lowest among the choices that were listed in Snapshot, but I’m sure the DAO could provide some additional funds (through a new proposal) if the need for that will arise.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-arbitrum-research-and-development-collective-term-2/26922)._