# \[Non-Constitutional\] Arbitrum Token Swap Pilot Program **URL:** \ **Category:** Archived Proposals\ **Tags:** proposal\ **Created:** [October 10, 2024, 11:36am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-arbitrum-token-swap-pilot-program/27106 "2024-10-10T11:36:26Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 48
**Author:** ![WinVerse](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/winverse/32/10523_2.png) [@WinVerse](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/WinVerse)\ **Post date:** [October 21, 2024, 12:59pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-arbitrum-token-swap-pilot-program/27106/48 "2024-10-21T12:59:50Z")
Thank you for stewarding this conversation, @LuukDAO. Token swap sounds interesting and could be beneficial but in its current form, this proposal doesn’t seem to be bringing much alignment and bidirectional upside to Arbitrum as several delegates already stated. > [@LuukDAO](#): > > - Execute at least three swaps and document the process and learnings > - Gain a better understanding of the change of behavior and perception of ecosystem players following a token swap with Arbitrum DAO On the KPIs front, would executing three swaps really give us a better understanding of the change of behavior of ecosystem players in Arbitrum? Are we sure we would get sufficient information from that? Talking to the swap generally, I know you touched on _The pressures that end partnerships_ in the report you linked. However, coming to Arbitrum, what are the plans in place to tackle some these issues you stated in the report? There is the risk of project failure and while diversification spreads risk, the DAO could end up holding tokens of projects that do not succeed, which could become a drag on the treasury. We suggest including a contingency plan for underperforming swaps. --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-arbitrum-token-swap-pilot-program/27106)._