I still support the discussion and want to see as much talk about treasury diversification as possible, but after thinking about it and reading all the comments… I’ll echo what @griff said as I probably agree with their take the most (although I agree with a lot of others).
The premise is good as it’s a tangible way to support other projects and other projects support us, but I’d like to see a longer commitment and LPing.
I know the shorter period is probably more to do with the pilot program aspect, but in terms of a pilot I think the variable to adjust here is spend, not length.
LPing I’d like to see more discussion on, as I’m starting to value more importantly getting sustainable returns on projects. Just a token swap essentially guarantees one of the partners to be a ‘loser’, which I think will sour the whole project.