# \[Non-Constitutional\] ArbitrumHub Evolution: The Next Step in Streamlining Information Access and Raising Awareness for Arbitrum DAO

**URL:** <https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-arbitrumhub-evolution-the-next-step-in-streamlining-information-access-and-raising-awareness-for-arbitrum-dao/24857>\
**Category:** Archived Proposals\
**Created:** [June 10, 2024, 7:49am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-arbitrumhub-evolution-the-next-step-in-streamlining-information-access-and-raising-awareness-for-arbitrum-dao/24857 "2024-06-10T07:49:06Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 9

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![0x\_Buidler](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/0x_buidler/32/2911_2.png) [@0x\_Buidler](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/0x_Buidler)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2024, 6:41am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-arbitrumhub-evolution-the-next-step-in-streamlining-information-access-and-raising-awareness-for-arbitrum-dao/24857/9 "2024-06-12T06:41:07Z")

</div>

Thank you, @cp0x, @Tane, and @jameskbh, for your constructive feedback.

Responses to Individual Comments and Questions:

@AlaniKuye:  
Thank you for your response. We appreciate your engagement and support for the project.

**Community Feedback Summary:**  
The community strongly supports this project and is eager to see it progress to the next steps. As highlighted by @cp0x, “I want to support your project; it is very necessary, and I use it myself, but I would like more transparency.” Additionally, @Tane noted that “the deliverables are great additions to the Arbitrum DAO governance accessibility,” and @jameskbh expressed, “Thanks for your proposal! I believe that we need a hub for all ARB-related information, and you guys are building something interesting.”

However, you mentioned two significant points as part of your feedback:

1. **Platform Utility:**  
The platform is useful and is already being utilized by many community members. It is a valuable addition to the Arbitrum DAO platform. With continuous updates and engagement, it will serve as the first point of contact for both new and existing Arbitrum users.

2. **Cost Concerns:**  
The major concern highlighted by the community members revolves around cost. Specifically:

Addressing each question in detail:

1. **“In accordance with the fact that the outcome criteria are unclear, the cost of this work is also unclear”**

2. **What’s the difference between the first item and the fourth item?**

3. **Why do you need “Community Contribution Incentives” and how do you plan to distribute them?**

4. **The second item literally mentioned “Reports,” but separate reports have their dedicated budget, which doesn’t make sense.**

5. **What would Advisors do and why does each advisor deserve $2k?**

6. **Also, we believe the sustainability of the tool shouldn’t only come from the DAO. Is the plan going to keep asking the budgets from the DAO to maintain the dashboard forever? How should the DAO evaluate the outcome from maintaining the dashboard?**

7. **Regarding @jameskbh’s question on collaboration, meetings, leads, and community contributions:**

**Conclusion:**

After carefully considering all the feedback, we have made changes and removed some elements from the proposal, resulting in a reduced budget compared to what was originally proposed. Please note that reducing the budget will not decrease the scope of taking ArbitrumHub to the next steps. We also agree with the community’s concerns. Therefore, we have revised the budget and removed some of the action items that were overlapping. We hope to continue serving ArbitrumDAO and look forward to the relevant support from the community.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-arbitrumhub-evolution-the-next-step-in-streamlining-information-access-and-raising-awareness-for-arbitrum-dao/24857)._