I’m voting in favor. I believe that in this period where Arbitrum is facing intense competition, it’s essential to keep up and push for an expansion of strategic partnership, which is the case with this proposal. While I recognize this need, I also believe that transparency should be at the core. As @Arbitrum mentioned above, disclosing details is sometimes either impossible due to confidentiality agreements or can lead to disadvantages in competitiveness, but I still think that some type of solution can be find to assure transparency and to see where this +250M ARB go. For example, what @JoJo mentioned is an interesting way of monitoring funds that I think it would be worth considering.
That said, I believe that in these situations there’s also a component of trust, and I support what Arbitrum Foundation is doing. I’m voting in favor, but I’d like to discuss some ways to provide oversight and transparency before going on tally.