Thank you Paulo for putting up this proposal.
We have voted Abstain in Snapshot to reflect our dual stance on this proposal:
In favour:
- We love the features you are proposing. Proposals.app is great and as delegates that check forum and voting platforms daily we think it’s a valuable tool to continue optimizing delegate activities.
- You are a valuable and committed member of the Arbitrum ecosystem, which the DAO should support into building useful tools like this one.
- The pricing of the proposal has dropped significantly following delegate feedback which shows great commitment to align with the community.
Against:
While we believe the scope of this proposal is valuable, we also recognize that it remains narrow in comparison to the wider set of governance infrastructure needs facing Arbitrum DAO. Recently, the Arbitrum Foundation has outlined a broader vision where high-level governance infrastructure, such as governance tooling, would eventually fall under the oversight and coordination of Arbitrum Aligned Entities (AAEs). We fully support this direction, and encourage that proposals like this one be considered as part of a more comprehensive governance tooling initiative. This would allow the DAO to better assess interdependencies, ensure long-term maintenance and alignment, and avoid fragmented tooling developments across isolated efforts.
We would like to request Paulo with further clarity on the team’s long-term vision for governance tooling in order to decide on a final decision for the eventual onchain proposal.