Camelot has voted “against” this proposal. We are builders first and foremost, so we want to be mindful of the efforts of Andrej and Paulo. We do appreciate experiments in Arbitrum and we do appreciate the effort of moving from an early stage to a full-fledged product. That said, we don’t currently see enough value in the deliverables proposed nor in the price tag associated. All the updates are “nice to have” updates, that can surely improve the life of delegates, but are not meaningful enough to justify an initiative financed by the DAO. At the same time, we do believe that even the new cost, $60k for one year compared to the previous $100k a year for a total of $200k over two years, is still excessive, despite the 40% reduction. Finally, we think the DAO currently should be focused not on governance matters or governance tooling, but on approaching a competitive landscape that is slowly eating away the advantage Arbitrum has built over time. The focus of the DAO should be on increasing activity on the chain, volume, and daily active users.