# \[Non-Constitutional\] Pilot Phase: Arbitrum Venture Initiative

**URL:** <https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-pilot-phase-arbitrum-venture-initiative/24247>\
**Category:** Finalized AIPs\
**Created:** [May 21, 2024, 12:47am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-pilot-phase-arbitrum-venture-initiative/24247 "2024-05-21T00:47:18Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 14

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![0x\_ultra](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/0x_ultra/32/236_2.png) [@0x\_ultra](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/0x_ultra)\
**Post date:** [June 6, 2024, 5:37am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-pilot-phase-arbitrum-venture-initiative/24247/14 "2024-06-06T05:37:55Z")

</div>

I’m voting “For”. This is a well put together proposal and the budget is not too high. I have the same concerns raised by the other comments above on the fact that there are already quite a few similar initiatives (specifically m&a) and there is no rush to keep opening new ones before we see the results, but given the relatively low cost it is still worth exploring this pilot phase. I do hope to see the proposal be refined before going on tally and the above delegate’s comments be addressed.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-pilot-phase-arbitrum-venture-initiative/24247)._