# \[Non-Constitutional\] Pilot Phase: Arbitrum Venture Initiative

**URL:** <https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-pilot-phase-arbitrum-venture-initiative/24247>\
**Category:** Finalized AIPs\
**Created:** [May 21, 2024, 12:47am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-pilot-phase-arbitrum-venture-initiative/24247 "2024-05-21T00:47:18Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 65

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BlockworksResearch](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/blockworksresearch/32/14962_2.png) [@BlockworksResearch](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/BlockworksResearch)\
**Post date:** [July 23, 2024, 12:40pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-pilot-phase-arbitrum-venture-initiative/24247/65 "2024-07-23T12:40:19Z")

</div>

Blockworks Research will be voting FOR this proposal on Tally.

Following extensive discussions with @lino, we have decided to support this proposal. Initially, we were concerned about the milestones, particularly the market analysis being conducted independently of the DAO. However, these concerns have now been clarified. We support the pilot phase of this initiative but emphasize that the DAO needs to find long-term solutions moving forward. As this is a period of experimentation for the DAO, we should remain cautious and avoid committing fully to one approach just yet.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-pilot-phase-arbitrum-venture-initiative/24247)._