# \[Non-Constitutional\] \[RFC\] Arbitrum D.A.O. (Domain Allocator Offerings) Grant Program - Season 3

**URL:** <https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-rfc-arbitrum-d-a-o-domain-allocator-offerings-grant-program-season-3/27584>\
**Category:** Finalized AIPs\
**Created:** [November 19, 2024, 2:47pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-rfc-arbitrum-d-a-o-domain-allocator-offerings-grant-program-season-3/27584 "2024-11-19T14:47:26Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 129

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![0x\_ultra](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/0x_ultra/32/236_2.png) [@0x\_ultra](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/0x_ultra)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2025, 4:06pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-rfc-arbitrum-d-a-o-domain-allocator-offerings-grant-program-season-3/27584/129 "2025-02-10T16:06:14Z")

</div>

I decided to confirm my vote in favor of this proposal for the same reasons as those expressed during the temp-check:

> [@\[Non-Constitutional\] \[RFC\] Arbitrum D.A.O. (Domain Allocator Offerings) Grant Program - Season 3](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-rfc-arbitrum-d-a-o-domain-allocator-offerings-grant-program-season-3/27584/83):
>
> I’m voting in favor of the renewal with five domains. Given the positive results of the previous seasons, I’m happy to support the 3rd iteration. I appreciate how the lessons learned from previous seasons were integrated into the new proposal. Concerning the voting option, I think that the inclusion of Orbit as a vertical offers significant benefits for projects considering launching their own chain and currently deciding on a stack, builders on orbit chains and the growth of the ecosystem as a…

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-rfc-arbitrum-d-a-o-domain-allocator-offerings-grant-program-season-3/27584)._
