# \[Non-Constitutional\] \[RFC\] Arbitrum D.A.O. (Domain Allocator Offerings) Grant Program - Season 3

**URL:** <https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-rfc-arbitrum-d-a-o-domain-allocator-offerings-grant-program-season-3/27584>\
**Category:** Finalized AIPs\
**Created:** [November 19, 2024, 2:47pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-rfc-arbitrum-d-a-o-domain-allocator-offerings-grant-program-season-3/27584 "2024-11-19T14:47:26Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 137

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![paulofonseca](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/paulofonseca/32/15551_2.png) [@paulofonseca](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/paulofonseca)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2025, 10:55am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-rfc-arbitrum-d-a-o-domain-allocator-offerings-grant-program-season-3/27584/137 "2025-02-12T10:55:27Z")

</div>

voting **FOR** the current onchain proposal because all things considered, I think there’s more pros than cons (barely) and the DAO needs an active grant program (up to $50k) right now. There’s a bunch of details I don’t agree with this is proposal to be honest, but all in all, it gets my For vote.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-rfc-arbitrum-d-a-o-domain-allocator-offerings-grant-program-season-3/27584)._
