# Non-Constitutional: Stable Treasury Endowment Program 2.0 **URL:** \ **Category:** Finalized AIPs\ **Created:** [September 17, 2024, 9:33am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-stable-treasury-endowment-program-2-0/26819 "2024-09-17T09:33:22Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 112
**Author:** ![0x\_ultra](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/0x_ultra/32/236_2.png) [@0x\_ultra](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/0x_ultra)\ **Post date:** [February 10, 2025, 4:03pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-stable-treasury-endowment-program-2-0/26819/112 "2025-02-10T16:03:00Z")
I’m voting for this proposal on Tally, confirming my previous rationale > [@Non-Constitutional: Stable Treasury Endowment Program 2.0](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-stable-treasury-endowment-program-2-0/26819/70): > > I’m voting FOR this proposal after carefully weighing the pros and cons. While I acknowledge some concerns raised about potential overlap with the Treasury Management Committee initiative or OpCo, I’ve decided to support this proposal. Although it may not be a perfect solution, it provides a path towards financial sustainability for the DAO and leverages the expertise of a proven team. I believe that RWA represent a crucial investment opportunity and are key to the long-term stability and appeal… --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-stable-treasury-endowment-program-2-0/26819)._