# Non-Constitutional: Stable Treasury Endowment Program 2.0

**URL:** <https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-stable-treasury-endowment-program-2-0/26819>\
**Category:** Finalized AIPs\
**Created:** [September 17, 2024, 9:33am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-stable-treasury-endowment-program-2-0/26819 "2024-09-17T09:33:22Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 55

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gabriel](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/gabriel/32/12436_2.png) [@Gabriel](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Gabriel)\
**Post date:** [January 14, 2025, 7:37pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-stable-treasury-endowment-program-2-0/26819/55 "2025-01-14T19:37:18Z")

</div>

I voted ‘for’ in Snapshot as I think RWA is critical for Arbitrum and will support proposals that focus on building in this area. However, I still believe this overlaps and may need to be taken over by the OpCo in the future as other responsibilities.

Two points I would like to add:

- More reporting on 1.0 is needed.
- Diversification of RWA is important, but no more than 5% should be allocated to other countries, as T-bills are the safest asset. This can be reassed yearly in the committee.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-stable-treasury-endowment-program-2-0/26819)._