# Non-Constitutional: Stable Treasury Endowment Program 2.0 **URL:** \ **Category:** Finalized AIPs\ **Created:** [September 17, 2024, 9:33am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-stable-treasury-endowment-program-2-0/26819 "2024-09-17T09:33:22Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 70
**Author:** ![0x\_ultra](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/0x_ultra/32/236_2.png) [@0x\_ultra](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/0x_ultra)\ **Post date:** [January 16, 2025, 4:03pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-stable-treasury-endowment-program-2-0/26819/70 "2025-01-16T16:03:33Z")
I’m voting FOR this proposal after carefully weighing the pros and cons. While I acknowledge some concerns raised about potential overlap with the Treasury Management Committee initiative or OpCo, I’ve decided to support this proposal. Although it may not be a perfect solution, it provides a path towards financial sustainability for the DAO and leverages the expertise of a proven team. I believe that RWA represent a crucial investment opportunity and are key to the long-term stability and appeal of the ecosystem. Besides that, I agree with @Jojo that this should be the last iteration of the STEP program in its current form. Moving forward, we should focus on developing a well-structured handover plan that ensures the necessary expertise is retained - whether through OpCo, TMC, or an alternative solution. --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-stable-treasury-endowment-program-2-0/26819)._