# \[Non-Constitutional\] Treasury Management v1.2

**URL:** <https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-treasury-management-v1-2/26967>\
**Category:** Finalized AIPs\
**Created:** [September 30, 2024, 12:42am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-treasury-management-v1-2/26967 "2024-09-30T00:42:46Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 10

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jameskbh](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/jameskbh/32/2667_2.png) [@jameskbh](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/jameskbh)\
**Post date:** [October 8, 2024, 12:16pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-treasury-management-v1-2/26967/10 "2024-10-08T12:16:20Z")

</div>

Thanks for the proposal!

As the DAO has a lot of moving parts (and proposals running in parallel) I wanted to highlight these two points:

> [@Entropy](#):
>
> Growth Management (GM): 7,500 ETH allotted (about 75% of the DAOs ETH after BoLD bootstrapping), but all spend must be DAO-approved on a case-by-case basis.

Ans, from the [ARB Staking proposal](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/arb-staking-unlock-arb-utility-and-align-governance/25084):

> [@ARB Staking: Unlock ARB Utility and Align Governance](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/arb-staking-unlock-arb-utility-and-align-governance/25084/1):
>
> ### Parallel workstreams: Staking Rewards and Delegation working groups
> 
> In parallel with the development of ARB Staking, we will lead two separate DAO working groups that are focused on aspects of the system that will be implemented after development is complete.
> 
> - The Staking Rewards working group will focus on how to fund staking rewards. It will develop a recommendation about whether staking rewards should be funded by sequencer fees, MEV fees, validator fees, token inflation, treasury diversification, and/or DAO venture investments and how to implement such rewards.

There is a non-zero chance that both proposals are going after the same resources here (the ETH from the sequencer fees). Is there a plan to better coordinate (or to adjust one proposal) so we don’t “double-spend” the resources? Mostly likely, the Staking Rewards WG will present a study/proposal before this one is approved on Tally.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-treasury-management-v1-2/26967)._