# \[Non-Constitutional\] Treasury Management v1.2 **URL:** \ **Category:** Finalized AIPs\ **Created:** [September 30, 2024, 12:42am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-treasury-management-v1-2/26967 "2024-09-30T00:42:46Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 73
**Author:** ![ocandocrypto](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/ocandocrypto/32/5015_2.png) [@ocandocrypto](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/ocandocrypto)\ **Post date:** [November 21, 2024, 3:09pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-treasury-management-v1-2/26967/73 "2024-11-21T15:09:49Z")
As in @web3citizen representation, voting **FOR** in this proposal and below is our rationale. > [@Web3 Citizen Delegate Communication Thread](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/web3-citizen-delegate-communication-thread/27518/4): > > Snapshot vote: Treasury Management v1.2 We are voting FOR this proposal in the Snapshot stage. Council structure and recommendations While we do understand the hesitation behind creating two entities to forward treasury management, we believe given the broad nature of the stated goals it does make sense to have two teams to provide multiple viewpoints on investment options for the DAO to review and approve. This could also have been achieved with two teams operating under a single committee. W… --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-treasury-management-v1-2/26967)._