# \[Non-Constitutional\] Treasury Management v1.2 **URL:** \ **Category:** Finalized AIPs\ **Created:** [September 30, 2024, 12:42am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-treasury-management-v1-2/26967 "2024-09-30T00:42:46Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 74
**Author:** ![Tane](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/tane/32/3187_2.png) [@Tane](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Tane)\ **Post date:** [November 21, 2024, 7:23pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-treasury-management-v1-2/26967/74 "2024-11-21T19:23:23Z")
We vote **FOR** the proposal on Snapshot. We believe establishing a proper treasury management function in the DAO is critical as the presented key issues should be addressed sooner rather than later. We also appreciate the updated proposal that have incorporated various feedback from the other delegates including the milestone-based compensation scheme. Ultimately, the program success depends on upcoming suggestions from the TMC and GMC and we believe the selected members are capable of providing them along the way. We will closely review them and make sure they are managed in an appropriate manner via their regular reporting. In the future, as @gauntlet suggested, the DAO should explore a less manual approach to manage the treasury with minimized operations (and operating members to be elected by the DAO if needed) and we would encourage the to-be-established OpCo to propose a revised plan after the 6-months v1.2 initiative. --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-treasury-management-v1-2/26967)._