# \[Non-Constitutional\] Treasury Management v1.2

**URL:** https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-treasury-management-v1-2/26967
**Category:** Finalized AIPs
**Created:** [September 30, 2024, 12:42am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-treasury-management-v1-2/26967 "2024-09-30T00:42:46Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 8

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Euphoria](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/euphoria/32/14303_2.png) [@Euphoria](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Euphoria)
#### Post date: [October 2, 2024, 5:39pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-treasury-management-v1-2/26967/8 "2024-10-02T17:39:44Z")

</div>

The following reflects the views of the Lampros Labs DAO governance team.

We appreciate the well-structured proposal and the thorough thought process behind Treasury Management v1.1. However, we have a few questions regarding certain aspects of the proposal that we believe require further clarification:

1. Could you elaborate on the specific performance metrics that will be used to assess the success of both the Treasury Management and Growth Management committees?

2. Additionally, could you clarify what is meant by “high guarantees” in the context of ETH-backed strategies? We are particularly interested in understanding how the DAO will assess and minimize risks while ensuring the safe return of ETH. What mechanisms or safeguards will be in place to protect the DAO’s funds and ensure these strategies remain low-risk?

> [@Entropy](#):
>
> with high guarantees of returning (at minimum) the original number of ETH deployed to the DAO treasury at a certain point in the future.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-treasury-management-v1-2/26967)._