We voted Against: Our current opinion is that this generally speaking has a good amount of overlap and we think this isn’t the best time to start this up. The ADPC has done a large part of the work here and we want some more clarity.
We voted For: These updates make sense and the ability to allow EOAs to execute smart contract code directly from their addresses and enabling of delegation, transaction batching, sponsorship, and privilege de-escalation are most interesting for us.
We voted #1 Deploy Both Strategies, #2 Only Deploy ARB Strategy, #3 Only Deploy Stable Strategy, #4 Deploy Nothing, Abstain: Overall, each of these strategies has its owns pros and cons but we are in favor of trialing both and then deciding in the future which to scale up/down. Some more comments can be found here: TMC’s Proposed Allocations - #32 by PGov
We voted For: We are continuously in support of these two and believe both will allow for more fee revenue collection into the DAO treasury in the future.
We voted For: As prior, we are in favor of the bootcamp and respective budgets. The team is well tasked to do so and we are voting in line with prior vote.
We voted For: After careful consideration and seeing some of the edits and changes made, we are in favor of the newly adapted Arbitrum Audit program and think that there are quite a few changes that let the overlap be distinct enough to warrant this being productive!
We voted For: These preferred and proposed allocations make sense and generally speaking fall in line with what we expect. We think above all, the ability to alter and adjust these positions over time will be the most important thing.
We voted Certora: With our smaller vote size, we voted for Certora as we’ve worked with them on many occasions and can speak highly of their quality of work.
We voted For: As we highlighted in the forums, we like how this proposal is focused on the tangible outcomes of CaC and Customer Lifetime Value. This should be a data driven approach to allocate effective and we are in favor.
We voted Yes, Deploy Stablecoin/ARB Strategy: Voting in line with our prior total snapshot. We think the individual strategies and descriptions are as expected and should be enacted.
We voted Chris Cameron, Federico Daffina, Frisson, Jana Bertram: We have worked with these individuals before in the past and believe they are well fit to serve on this committee.
We voted Yes to Both: We are in favor of topping-up the HCP and leftover funds to the TMC as both are reasonable and aligned with the original vote budgets.
We voted For: Similar to our prior reasoning for the Snapshot, having this high level misuse bounty program is logical and should ensure more accountability within the DAO. We rae favor of the most recent edits and believe this will be very important for the DAO going forward
We vote For: Mostly in support here. It’s refreshing to see this after a long pause and we believe the team and foundation synergies behind such is well needed for this to succeed.
We voted For: Echoing our snapshot comments in that these updates make sense and the ability to allow EOAs to execute smart contract code directly from their addresses and enabling of delegation, transaction batching, sponsorship, and privilege de-escalation.