I will be voting FOR the ban on Furucombo. It seems clear from the discussion that the Foundation has put in a reasonable effort to have the Furucombo team correct the issue and they chose not to do anything within a reasonable timeframe. Taking the response at face value, it is unfortunate that a miscommunication occurred due to the way the KYC was setup by the Furucombo team. However, there should be some onus on the entities receiving the funds to properly setup their communication channels to avoid this type of issue.
I’ll also add that even if we forgive it all as a communication issue, there have been other issues beyond a failure to return funds timely. Such as not really addressing ‘the why’ of why funds went to an exchange. As well as claims by users that the STIP was not ran according to initial intents.
As a larger DAO discussion, I would agree with a lot of the “Lessons Learned” section in the OP. And I think there are some going points made in terms of how to handle funding with future projects.