We see that some details about each project have been added, and if our understanding is correct that the projects all fulfilled KYC obligations to the best of their ability and on time we would support making up the difference in this particular circumstance. We want to make clear that this isn’t because the token price changed, but rather the time it took to pay out. While this wasn’t a grant and there were no promised timelines on delivery, @disruptionjoe has noted in the other thread about this issue that this program faced significant delays unlike others and because of that we believe that it warrants some compensation.
We also agree that we need to figure out better processes around KYC and management with multiple entities if issues are common enough that they’re becoming part of the DAO’s brand and even high context delegates like @Bob-Rossi are having problems. Making it well understood which countries may not be able to get paid out seems like an easy start, but we’d also suggest an open survey to understand what other issues there have been from the side of delegates and the wider community. Once we have a set of answers, we can sort through and figure out what’s solvable through operational changes or better communication and what’s just an unfortunate reality of having to deal with legal systems.