# Proposal \[Non-Constitutional\] Arbitrum Treasury Token Swap Program

**URL:** <https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/proposal-non-constitutional-arbitrum-treasury-token-swap-program/23303>\
**Category:** Archived Proposals\
**Created:** [April 19, 2024, 2:01pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/proposal-non-constitutional-arbitrum-treasury-token-swap-program/23303 "2024-04-19T14:01:50Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 26

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cp0x](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/cp0x/32/5455_2.png) [@cp0x](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/cp0x)\
**Post date:** [September 24, 2024, 10:24pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/proposal-non-constitutional-arbitrum-treasury-token-swap-program/23303/26 "2024-09-24T22:24:56Z")

</div>

I support this idea. But in addition to the idea itself, we need to figure out the financial side of the deal:

1. What will motivate other projects to exchange their tokens with us?
2. Since we will have management tokens, we will need to participate in meta-management. Who and how will do this on behalf of ArbitrumDAO?
3. How will we understand that this project is successful for ArbitrumDAO? Are there any planned criteria for success?
4. I am very confused by the costs of this initiative:  
The author of the initiative should of course be encouraged, but it seems to me that a salary of 5,000 per week is a lot. Per month - this is more than 20,000 ARB or $ 12,800 per month.  
I don’t want to offend anyone, but I still think that this is too much, especially at the stage of the post-exchange period.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/proposal-non-constitutional-arbitrum-treasury-token-swap-program/23303)._
