# Proposal \[Non-Constitutional\]: Set up a Sub-Committee for the Security Services Subsidy Fund **URL:** \ **Category:** Archived Proposals\ **Created:** [May 13, 2024, 10:03am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/proposal-non-constitutional-set-up-a-sub-committee-for-the-security-services-subsidy-fund/23766 "2024-05-13T10:03:02Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 17
**Author:** ![SavvyDAO](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/savvydao/32/4578_2.png) [@SavvyDAO](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/SavvyDAO)\ **Post date:** [June 6, 2024, 12:14am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/proposal-non-constitutional-set-up-a-sub-committee-for-the-security-services-subsidy-fund/23766/17 "2024-06-06T00:14:23Z")
### Savvy DAO votes AGAINST the “Security Services Subsidy Fund Sub-Committee” proposal. > [@Savvy DAO - Delegate Communication Thread](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/savvy-dao-delegate-communication-thread/21266/44): > > Savvy DAO votes AGAINST the “Security Services Subsidy Fund Sub-Committee” proposal. Key Reasons: Duplication of Efforts: Establishing a new sub-committee duplicates existing efforts of the ADPC, leading to inefficiencies and potential overlaps in responsibilities. Resource Allocation: The proposal requests 60,000 ARB for compensation over 8 weeks, which seems excessive given the proposed workload and existing compensation structures. Delay in Subsidy Disbursement: The additional onboarding an… --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/proposal-non-constitutional-set-up-a-sub-committee-for-the-security-services-subsidy-fund/23766)._