# Proposal to Temporary Extend Delegate Incentive System

**URL:** <https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/proposal-to-temporary-extend-delegate-incentive-system/26179>\
**Category:** Finalized AIPs\
**Created:** [August 9, 2024, 7:23am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/proposal-to-temporary-extend-delegate-incentive-system/26179 "2024-08-09T07:23:12Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 5\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AbdullahUmar](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/abdullahumar/32/5025_2.png) [@AbdullahUmar](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/AbdullahUmar)\
**Post date:** [August 31, 2024, 8:38pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/proposal-to-temporary-extend-delegate-incentive-system/26179/42 "2024-08-31T20:38:06Z")

</div>

Below are the reflections of the UADP:

We voted For this proposal since extending this program by two months would be nice to maintain the momentum that’s been built with the increased level of incentivized delegate involvement. For this program, and for other programs, it’s important to consider buffer periods. An initial proposal that’s meant to last 6-months could actually span for 7 months for the sake of a smooth transition to the next iteration of that program. During that 7th month, v2 of a program can be voted on.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AlexLumley](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/alexlumley/32/3790_2.png) [@AlexLumley](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/AlexLumley)\
**Post date:** [September 1, 2024, 4:13am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/proposal-to-temporary-extend-delegate-incentive-system/26179/43 "2024-09-01T04:13:41Z")

</div>

Alex Lumley, Savvy Delegate - Commenting Rationale

See voting rationale here here: [Alex Lumley (Savvy DAO) Delegate Communication Thread - #7 by AlexLumley](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/alex-lumley-savvy-dao-delegate-communication-thread/26147/7)

**Rationale:**

These adjustments aim to maintain delegate engagement during the system transition, addressing economic fluctuations and operational needs.

**Feedback for Improvement:**

• **Financial Details:** More detailed financial impact analysis is needed.

• **Risk Management:** Identify and mitigate financial risks.

• **Community Engagement:** Enhance community input to ensure the proposal aligns with broader interests.

**Financial Implications:**

The changes will be funded from existing reserves, emphasizing the need for a detailed budget to ensure sustainability.

**Considerations for Version 2**  
For a future delegate incentive program, I’d like to see better tying the program to Arbitrum and making the program less dependent only on SEEDGov. This is an awesome program and we just want to make it more anti-fragile, in case anything happens to members currently running it. (This is a general principle we should take to more of our programs).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Djinn](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/65b543/32.png) [@Djinn](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Djinn)\
**Post date:** [September 2, 2024, 3:59am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/proposal-to-temporary-extend-delegate-incentive-system/26179/44 "2024-09-02T03:59:32Z")

</div>

Voted FOR.

The incentive program seems to have driven some engagement - but I really want to emphasize that we should press on delegate accountability and incentives way deeper than this program.

1. Does delegation actually work as intended?
2. How can we ensure that delegation is impacted by the delegate decisions vs their stakeholder’s ideals?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SEEDGov](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/seedgov/32/14560_2.png) [@SEEDGov](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/SEEDGov)\
**Post date:** [September 3, 2024, 4:27pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/proposal-to-temporary-extend-delegate-incentive-system/26179/45 "2024-09-03T16:27:03Z")

</div>

With the Snapshot Vote already approved and since the funds remain in the multi-sig, no on-chain actions are required. Therefore, the extension doesn’t need to go through a Tally vote.

> [@Arbitrum Multi-sig Support Service (MSS) Nomination Thread](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/arbitrum-multi-sig-support-service-mss-nomination-thread/24773/59):
>
> The Arbitrum MSS onchain proposal has been executed and the Arbitrum MSS has been funded.
> 
> We anticipate that the MSS will start to be used in September, when the delegate incentives multisig is migrated to use the MSS: [Proposal to Temporary Extend Delegate Incentive System. - #21 by axlvaz\_SEEDLATAM.eth](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/proposal-to-temporary-extend-delegate-incentive-system/26179/21)

After August compensations are disbursed, the Delegate Incentive Program will adhere to [Multi-sig Support Service (MSS)](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/arbitrum/proposal/47904929527582233304785161920776863155691990219898799848510210794906211250836). SEEDGov aligns with the community’s perspective that the MSS unit will significantly boost efficiency, savings, and transparency in DAO operations. These enhancements are essential as the Delegate Incentive Program has to fund various delegates each month.

Payment requestors for the DIP will be @Gianluca and @Manugotsuka, both members of the SEEDGov Team.

We invite you all to keep contributing to [RFC - Delegate Incentive Program v1.1](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/rfc-delegate-incentive-program-v1-1/26496)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SEEDGov](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/seedgov/32/14560_2.png) [@SEEDGov](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/SEEDGov)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2024, 12:24am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/proposal-to-temporary-extend-delegate-incentive-system/26179/46 "2024-10-01T00:24:33Z")

</div>

The Incentive Program funds were migrated to the MSS.

> [@MSS for Arbitrum - Communication Thread (Arbitrum Multisig Support Service)](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/mss-for-arbitrum-communication-thread-arbitrum-multisig-support-service/26508/3):
>
> # MSS Update 23/09
> 
> ## Multisigs deployed:
> 
> [Delegate Incentives Program](https://app.safe.global/home?safe=arb1:0x7b79108E99b8aCe932A8737c471235F5Fb7647Df) - Funds will be migrated from the program’s multisig to the MSS multisig to pay the 2 month extension as requested by the program managers as stated [here](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/proposal-to-temporary-extend-delegate-incentive-system/26179/45).

Tx: [Arbitrum One Transaction Hash (Txhash) Details | Arbitrum One](https://arbiscan.io/tx/0x1d9cea4b5d2bd11e3dc0428cc7f241c188ccd2560f3ae886adf5e877035f3ac7)

[Previous page](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/proposal-to-temporary-extend-delegate-incentive-system/26179.md?page=2)
