Questbook DDA Program Phase 2 Request for Continuation

[Curia]

We are in favor of supporting the Questbook DDA Program Phase 2, acknowledging their significant past contributions However, we recommend a governance revision, particularly advocating for new elections for domain allocators, to encourage diversity and fresh ideas, avoid power capture, and ensure an equitable and dynamic selection process for those willing to undertake responsibilities.

@jengajojo

I would like to request term limits of maximum 1 year on the domain allocation seats for individuals. i.e. each individual can occupy the seat for maximum 1 year.

Rationale:

1. Preventing entrenchment and foster new ideas: Long-serving members may become resistant to new ideas and less receptive to fresh perspectives.Term limits encourage a regular infusion of new talent and expertise.
2. Mitigating conflicts of interest: Long-serving members may develop close relationships with grant applicants or recipients, potentially leading to conflicts of interest.Term limits can help mitigate such conflicts and ensure the decision-making process remains impartial & fair.
3. Encouraging mentorship: offers opportunities for experienced members to mentor & train their successors.This can help build institutional knowledge and maintain consistency in the programs mission while still introducing new perspectives.
4. Reinforcing democratic principles: rotation in public office prevents the concentration of power while ensuring that decisions are made with the broader interest in mind.

We also agree with @jengajojo on this; however, we believe this position should be re-elected every phase.