Thanks for putting this together! It’s clear that a lot of thought went into evaluating these applications, and I really appreciate the transparency around the process.
That said, I don’t think extending the budget for the Stylus Sprint is the right move. The initial 5M ARB budget was set with clear expectations, and I worry that making exceptions now could set a precedent that future funding rounds are flexible. That kind of uncertainty can make it harder for the DAO to plan long-term.
I also know how much effort teams put into their applications, and it’s tough to see great projects miss out due to budget limits. The level of talent and innovation in this round is a testament to the excitement around Stylus, and I really hope these teams stay engaged and explore other paths to funding.
Appreciate all the work the committee has done to make this process fair and transparent. This isn’t a no to these projects—just a belief that we need to stay disciplined in how we allocate funds.