# \[RFC\] Arbitrum Multi-sig Support Service (MSS)

**URL:** <https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/rfc-arbitrum-multi-sig-support-service-mss/23737>\
**Category:** Finalized AIPs\
**Tags:** proposal\
**Created:** [May 9, 2024, 3:33pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/rfc-arbitrum-multi-sig-support-service-mss/23737 "2024-05-09T15:33:39Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 73

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Frisson](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/frisson/32/2288_2.png) [@Frisson](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Frisson)\
**Post date:** [August 7, 2024, 11:16pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/rfc-arbitrum-multi-sig-support-service-mss/23737/73 "2024-08-07T23:16:40Z")

</div>

I voted FOR this proposal on Tally, for the reasons outlined below

> [@Frisson](#):
>
> I’m in favor of this initiative. In addition to generating cost savings, I believe it will make the DAO more efficient and safer by creating one clear set of multisig operations that can be audited and integrated with from a tooling perspective.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/rfc-arbitrum-multi-sig-support-service-mss/23737)._