# \[RFC\] Arbitrum Multi-sig Support Service (MSS) **URL:** \ **Category:** Finalized AIPs\ **Tags:** proposal\ **Created:** [May 9, 2024, 3:33pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/rfc-arbitrum-multi-sig-support-service-mss/23737 "2024-05-09T15:33:39Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 75
**Author:** ![Tane](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/tane/32/3187_2.png) [@Tane](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Tane)\ **Post date:** [August 12, 2024, 9:43pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/rfc-arbitrum-multi-sig-support-service-mss/23737/75 "2024-08-12T21:43:48Z")
We vote **FOR** the proposal on Tally. We maintain the rationale below on this proposal and continue to support the selected members to act as the guardians of the Arbitrum Multi-sig. > [@\[RFC\] Arbitrum Multi-sig Support Service (MSS)](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/rfc-arbitrum-multi-sig-support-service-mss/23737/32): > > Thanks @Entropy for putting together the proposal. It’s definitely an important issue to be addressed and we appreciate the effort to modify the proposal as the feedback from the delegates are given. We vote FOR the proposal at its Snapshot phase with the additional report included as the first selection. As described, this change will clearly increase the efficiency of the similar operations for the various initiatives. We would also like to see the election and term systems to be included in … --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/rfc-arbitrum-multi-sig-support-service-mss/23737)._