The following reflects the views of the Lampros DAO governance team, composed of Chain_L (@Blueweb) and @Euphoria, based on our combined research, analysis, and ideation.
When Event Horizon proposed the Voter Enfranchisement Pool, we were aligned with its core idea, to test an experimental approach to empowering community members who want to participate in governance but lack sufficient voting power.
In fact, we have also guided some new users (who wanted to participate in governance) towards this path to help them understand how governance participation works and to feel more connected to the decision-making process.
Also, we know that there were discussions around the marketing efforts specifically for the Arbitrum community pool. One of the possible reasons we haven’t seen the full impact reflected in participation metrics might be that the pool has not yet reached its ideal target audience effectively. It’s likely that with better outreach, more users would have leveraged this opportunity as originally intended.
While reviewing this proposal’s options on adjusting the delegation, we also revisited the Tally proposal passed last September, which committed to bi-annual reporting, including KPIs. So now it’s more than 6 months, apart from the Event Horizon Updates Thread, we wanted to know if such a report has been made public and we have missed them, or if they are still forthcoming. @EventHorizonDAO @DonOfDAOs
Regarding the pivot towards agentic governance, we acknowledge that agentic governance is an emerging trend in DAO governance, and other ecosystems are actively investing in it. As a team, we are working on agentic governance development for Optimism ourselves.
That said, we want to emphasize that agentic governance is a separate and distinct initiative from the original Voter Enfranchisement Pool. While we appreciate Event Horizon’s work on agentic governance for Arbitrum, we believe this direction deserves its own dedicated proposal, as in AGI.