# STEP Committee Recommendations **URL:** https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/step-committee-recommendations/25097 **Category:** STEP Applications & Updates **Created:** [June 22, 2024, 6:43pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/step-committee-recommendations/25097 "2024-06-22T18:43:02Z") **Posts on this page:** 1 **Showing post:** 30
### Author: ![JoJo](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/jojo/32/2666_2.png) [@JoJo](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/JoJo) #### Post date: [July 10, 2024, 6:39pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/step-committee-recommendations/25097/30 "2024-07-10T18:39:16Z")
Voting “for” on this proposal. This is the natural evolution of several months work, experimental but also important in size, that we need for our treasury. As i told devansh in other channels, what i don’t like is the fact that the trimming from the initial 17 projects to the current 6 has not been publicly motivated. While I can understand some issues in disclosing details on unreleased products, the space would likely benefit most in understanding why a protocol was selected, and why another was not. I strongly suggest, for a potential next iteration of this, to change this specific course of action. --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/step-committee-recommendations/25097)._