# Strategic Treasury Management on Arbitrum

**URL:** <https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/strategic-treasury-management-on-arbitrum/25301>\
**Category:** Archived Proposals\
**Created:** [July 5, 2024, 9:27am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/strategic-treasury-management-on-arbitrum/25301 "2024-07-05T09:27:19Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 17

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![thedevanshmehta](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/thedevanshmehta/32/2334_2.png) [@thedevanshmehta](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/thedevanshmehta)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2024, 1:09am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/strategic-treasury-management-on-arbitrum/25301/17 "2024-07-12T01:09:45Z")

</div>

> [@karpatkey](#):
>
> On the other hand, off-chain holdings cannot allow for non-custodial solution, so it is most likely that we’ll not explore off-chain holdings.

Given the poor state of ARB onchain liquidity that was uncovered in [yours](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/arbitrum-treasury-and-sustainability-research/20630/) and [Aera’s](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/arbitrum-treasury-management-report-by-aera/20652) report, how would you approach diversification of the 250 million ARB if all of the conversion is done onchain?

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/strategic-treasury-management-on-arbitrum/25301)._