# Strategic Treasury Management on Arbitrum

**URL:** <https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/strategic-treasury-management-on-arbitrum/25301>\
**Category:** Archived Proposals\
**Created:** [July 5, 2024, 9:27am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/strategic-treasury-management-on-arbitrum/25301 "2024-07-05T09:27:19Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 53

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Larva](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/larva/32/1896_2.png) [@Larva](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Larva)\
**Post date:** [August 19, 2024, 8:56pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/strategic-treasury-management-on-arbitrum/25301/53 "2024-08-19T20:56:44Z")

</div>

Diversifying DAO assets is indeed important, but I don’t consider it an urgent matter. ARB can effectively serve as the base asset for Arbitrum DAO. Moreover, 250M is an excessively large amount, and the 1% management fee is too high. This could lead to new issues, such as the management team focusing on their own income rather than the DAO’s interests. Therefore, I am inclined to oppose this proposal for now.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/strategic-treasury-management-on-arbitrum/25301)._