# Streamlining the LTIPP Bounties

**URL:** <https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/streamlining-the-ltipp-bounties/23786>\
**Category:** LTIPP Bounties\
**Created:** [May 14, 2024, 2:41am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/streamlining-the-ltipp-bounties/23786 "2024-05-14T02:41:10Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 16

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![0x\_ultra](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/0x_ultra/32/236_2.png) [@0x\_ultra](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/0x_ultra)\
**Post date:** [May 29, 2024, 6:20am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/streamlining-the-ltipp-bounties/23786/16 "2024-05-29T06:20:57Z")

</div>

I’m voting in support of this proposal.  
Giving more autonomy to the LTIPP council facilitates management of internal funds and makes it more efficient. Overall, council has better expertise, knowledge and more time to evaluate the LTIPP bounty grants compared to most delegates.

I agree with the suggestion proposed by @Bob-Rossi , although giving more autonomy and speeding the process up is important - leaving some backdoors where the DAO can intervene such as a challenge period is equally as important. If there is disagreement with what council decides, intervention should be able to happen.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/streamlining-the-ltipp-bounties/23786)._